2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/1985026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Platelet Volume and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Aim To evaluate the association between mean platelet volume (MPV) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to 4 September 2017. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effect model. Results Nineteen studies comprising 1361 GDM patients and 1911 normal pregnant women were included. MPV was increased in GDM patients when compared w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPV values of GDM patients were found to be significantly increased compared to healthy pregnant women, while the other platelet parameters were the same [17]. Other studies showed that neither PC nor MPV values were different between GDM and control group similar to our study results [18][19][20]. Zou and et al studied a systematic review and meta-analysis which included 1361 patients with GDM and 1911 healthy pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MPV values of GDM patients were found to be significantly increased compared to healthy pregnant women, while the other platelet parameters were the same [17]. Other studies showed that neither PC nor MPV values were different between GDM and control group similar to our study results [18][19][20]. Zou and et al studied a systematic review and meta-analysis which included 1361 patients with GDM and 1911 healthy pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However; due to not only the using of the varied diagnostic criteria but also the heterogeneity of the patient groups that included in the studies; there was a potential bias. Consequently; outcomes were not clear in this meta-analysis [18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[22] Platelet indices including MPV, PDW, PCT and indices such as PLR and NLR have been shown to be affected in GDM patients. [8][9][10][11][12] However, the results are contradictory as there are numerous studies that reported no difference in these parameters. [10,[14][15][16][17] Similarly, there are contradictory results with respect to WBC and red blood cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Some investigators focused on the inflammatory markers as there is chronic low-grade inflammation that triggers vascular injury and dysfunction and subsequent platelet activation in GDM. [6,7] Recently because, systemic inflammatory response markers that are components of complete blood count test (CBC) including neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), [8][9][10] platelet indices including platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV) platelet distribution width (PDW), plateletcrit (PCT), [11,12] white blood cells, red blood cells [13] are suggested to differ in GDM patients in different studies. However, in some other studies these results could not be confirmed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we hypothesize that there is a relationship between platelet indices and PDPH. MPV, which reflects platelet size and production rate in bone marrow, is a commonly used parameter to evaluate platelet activity and function [20,[39][40][41]. MPV has been studied in the context of many pathological conditions, including cardiovascular, respiratory, inflammatory, and neoplastic diseases, and has been reported to be an important marker in some of these diseases [24][25][26][27][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%