2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0037248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting.

Abstract: In this study, we investigated mean-level personality development in children from 6 to 20 years of age. Additionally, we investigated longitudinal, bidirectional associations between child personality and maternal overreactive and warm parenting. In this 5-wave study, mothers reported on their child's personality from Time 1 (T1) through Time 4 (T4), and children provided self-reports from Time 2 (T2) through Time 5 (T5). Mothers reported on their levels of overreactive and warm parenting from T2 through T4. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
209
6
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
42
209
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in mean levels of Ascendance, and Social Extroversion over time implied declines in Extraversion across adolescence. These results are roughly comparable with studies by Soto et al (2011) and Van den Akker (2014). However, it should be noted that these phenotypic results were Note: A = additive genetic effect, E = non-shared environmental effect, rg = genetic correlation between two time points, re = environmental correlation between two time points, 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.…”
Section: Adolescent Personality Development: Results From Phenotypic supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The differences in mean levels of Ascendance, and Social Extroversion over time implied declines in Extraversion across adolescence. These results are roughly comparable with studies by Soto et al (2011) and Van den Akker (2014). However, it should be noted that these phenotypic results were Note: A = additive genetic effect, E = non-shared environmental effect, rg = genetic correlation between two time points, re = environmental correlation between two time points, 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.…”
Section: Adolescent Personality Development: Results From Phenotypic supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Second, the shared growth factor among childhood dark traits shows an overall declining trend over time, underscoring established evidence on maturation effects of traits Van den Akker, et al, 2014) and more general externalizing psychopathology (Bongers, Koot, Van der Ende, & Verhulst, 2004), presumably resulting from an improvement in social and communication skills, self-regulation and impulse control (Hammond, et al, Eisenberg et al, 2006). Of note here is, that growth in Resistance is largely captured by the common growth factor, because this trait showed almost no evolution over time, nor did it demonstrate interindividual variability in growth patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parenting is expected to influence children's temperamental development, and those same child behaviors appear to elicit differential parental responses (Lengua & Kovacs, 2005; Van den Akker, Deković, Asscher, & Prinzie, 2014). For the present purposes, there was concern with the evocation of differential parental behavior due to child temperament.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%