2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Hilbert envelope coefficients (MHEC) for robust speaker and language identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the performance on the proposed method changes under clean condition depending on noise type due to using different noise dictionaries, whereas the baseline methods do not, which is to be expected. The general trend across all noise types is that all the enhancement algorithms does improve performance for SNR≤10 dB, which is in line with the results obtained in [5]. The proposed method outperforms the other algorithms with a substantial margin in this range of SNR levels except for the case of babble noise.…”
Section: Speaker Verification Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that the performance on the proposed method changes under clean condition depending on noise type due to using different noise dictionaries, whereas the baseline methods do not, which is to be expected. The general trend across all noise types is that all the enhancement algorithms does improve performance for SNR≤10 dB, which is in line with the results obtained in [5]. The proposed method outperforms the other algorithms with a substantial margin in this range of SNR levels except for the case of babble noise.…”
Section: Speaker Verification Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…al. [5] investigate the performance of speech enhancement techniques for speaker identification under noisy and mis-matched conditions and conclude that for low signal-to-noise ratios (0, 5 and 10 dB), there is generally a performance gain, but that enhancement can degrade performance at higher SNR and perform worse than using the noisy signal directly. The authors furthermore propose to use mean Hilbert envelope coefficients (MHEC) as features and show that they outperform conventional mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it should be noted that power spectral subtraction is used in the preprocessing to suppress additive noise, which probably increased the recognition rate for both the baseline methods, and the proposed method. Two-dimensional (2D) [19À20], [23], [31], [34], [38], [47], [49], [51], [54À58] auto-regressive (AR) spectrograms are used in [43] to eliminate noise effects. In this method, two LP analysis, one in time domain, and the other in frequency domain, are applied to speech signal.…”
Section: Robust Features Against Additive Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using the MFCCs, other types of features are proposed by the researchers to increase the robustness of the recognizers [4][5][6][7][8]. Also, since the MFCCs are widely adopted, many researchers have made effort to improve its robustness under noise by modifying, or changing, some processes in the conventional scheme [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%