1983
DOI: 10.1016/0278-4343(83)90011-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean flow and turbulence scaling in a tidal boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
91
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative method for estimating the bottom stress based on bulk parameterisation is to fit a logarithmic curve, applicable to the benthic constant stress layer, to the current profile in the water column (Gross and Nowell, 1983;Lueck and Lu, 1997). where u à is the friction velocity; z 0 , as already described, is the roughness length and the bottom stress, t b ¼ ru 2 à .…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative method for estimating the bottom stress based on bulk parameterisation is to fit a logarithmic curve, applicable to the benthic constant stress layer, to the current profile in the water column (Gross and Nowell, 1983;Lueck and Lu, 1997). where u à is the friction velocity; z 0 , as already described, is the roughness length and the bottom stress, t b ¼ ru 2 à .…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lid was pushed down from above, bending the smaller, flexible locking posts until they locked the lid in were calculated from velocity profiles asplace. A Neoprene rubber gasket ring, consuming an equilibrium boundary layer, as tained within a circular groove cut on a 45" by Gross and Nowell (1983), using eight angle to the surface of the lid, proved effecpoints within an estimated logarithmic (log) tive in preventing sediment leakage during layer between 1.27 and 8.2 cm above the recovery or deployment of trays. A smaller, sediment surface.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be characterized by us, the boundary shear velocity, assuming steady unidirectional flow and an absence of nearby topographic features. Calcuations of u* for field flows are often made by measuring velocity profiles in the logarithmic layer of the boundary layer (Chriss and Caldwell 1982;Gross and Nowell 1983;Gross et al 1986). If a profile is not available, however, the velocity at a single height within the logarithmic layer can be used to estimate u* less precisely:…”
Section: Field Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 15"N, f= 3.8 x 1 Oe5 s-l. If the logarithmic layer is estimated as a tenth the height of the boundary layer (following Gross et al 1986), then the log layer is at least 6 m thick for values of u* > 0.5 cm s-l. Equation 1 can be used to show that current velocities (at 6 m) of 10 cm s-l and greater are fast enough to form a log layer 6 m thick.…”
Section: Field Sitementioning
confidence: 99%