1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.58.9421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean-field theory for arrays of Josephson-coupled wires

Abstract: We describe a mean-field theory for phase transitions in a Josephson junction array consisting of two sets of parallel wire networks, arranged at right angles and coupled together by Josephson interactions. In contrast to earlier treatments, we include the variation of the superconducting phase along the individual wires; such variation is always present if the wires have finite thickness and are sufficiently long. The mean-field result is obtained by treating the individual wires exactly and the coupling betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 This same effect causes the critical current of the array to saturate at a finite value which depends on the Josephson penetration depth, even as N → ∞. 5,6 The exactness of mean-field theory is believed to have an analog in the dynamics of these arrays. Chandra et al 7,8 have studied a version of local dynamics equivalent, in the large-N limit, to the resistively-shunted junction (RSJ) model with Gaussian thermal noise and no applied current (they use a different numerical approach from that followed here).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This same effect causes the critical current of the array to saturate at a finite value which depends on the Josephson penetration depth, even as N → ∞. 5,6 The exactness of mean-field theory is believed to have an analog in the dynamics of these arrays. Chandra et al 7,8 have studied a version of local dynamics equivalent, in the large-N limit, to the resistively-shunted junction (RSJ) model with Gaussian thermal noise and no applied current (they use a different numerical approach from that followed here).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%