2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.03639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean Field Analysis of Controlled Cucker-Smale Type Flocking: Linear Analysis and Perturbation Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 1) travel time minimization, it is intended to minimize the remaining travel distance r i (t) 2 , while maximizing the velocity towards the destination, i.e., minimizing the projected velocity v i (t) · r i (t)/ r i (t) towards the opposite direction to the destination. For 2) motion energy minimization, it is planned to minimize the kinetic energy and the acceleration control energy that are proportional to v i (t) 2 and a i (t) 2 , respectively [12], [13]. The global term φ G (s Ni (t)) in (3) refers to 3) collision avoidance, and is intended to form a flock of UAVs moving together [14].…”
Section: ) Collision Avoidance and Connectivity Guaranteementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 1) travel time minimization, it is intended to minimize the remaining travel distance r i (t) 2 , while maximizing the velocity towards the destination, i.e., minimizing the projected velocity v i (t) · r i (t)/ r i (t) towards the opposite direction to the destination. For 2) motion energy minimization, it is planned to minimize the kinetic energy and the acceleration control energy that are proportional to v i (t) 2 and a i (t) 2 , respectively [12], [13]. The global term φ G (s Ni (t)) in (3) refers to 3) collision avoidance, and is intended to form a flock of UAVs moving together [14].…”
Section: ) Collision Avoidance and Connectivity Guaranteementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the algorithm is unable to take into account its corresponding energy efficiency. We overcome these limitations by leveraging a noncooperative game theoretic approach, as done in [17]- [21]. In our modified CS flocking algorithm, each UAV tries to minimize its long-term energy cost and its flocking cost.…”
Section: A Flocking Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flocking cost follows from [17]. Denoting v(t) = {v 1 (t), ..., v N (t)} as the set of UAV velocities and z(t) = {z 1 (t), ..., z N (t)} as the set of their locations at time t, the flocking cost F i (v(t), z(t)) is given as:…”
Section: A Flocking Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalently, mean field games must be regarded as the continuum limit of games with a large number of symmetric players, each of them having a small effect on the dynamics of the whole group. The applications of mean field games are numerous, and spread across many disciplines, including social science (congestion [25] [19] [3], cyber attacks [12]), biology (flocking [28] [29]), and economics (systemic risk [11], production of exhaustible resources [23] [13]), just to name a few. As explained in [8,9], solutions to mean field games can be characterized through a coupled system of two forward and backward stochastic differential equations of mean field type, like those we address in this note.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%