Mean Expected Error in Prediction of Total Body Water: A True Accuracy Comparison between Bioimpedance Spectroscopy and Single Frequency Regression Equations

Abstract

For several decades electrical bioimpedance (EBI) has been used to assess body fluid distribution and body composition. Despite the development of several different approaches for assessing total body water (TBW), it remains uncertain whether bioimpedance spectroscopic (BIS) approaches are more accurate than single frequency regression equations. The main objective of this study was to answer this question by calculating the expected accuracy of a single measurement for different EBI methods. The results of this study showed that all methods produced similarly high correlation and concordance coefficients, indicating good accuracy as a method. Even the limits of agreement produced from the Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the performance of single frequency, Sun's prediction equations, at population level was close to the performance of both BIS methods; however, when comparing the Mean Absolute Percentage Error value between the single frequency prediction equations and the BIS methods, a significant difference was obtained, indicating slightly better accuracy for the BIS methods. Despite the higher accuracy of BIS methods over 50 kHz prediction equations at both population and individual level, the magnitude of the improvement was small. Such slight improvement in accuracy of BIS methods is suggested insufficient to warrant their clinical use where the most accurate predictions of TBW are required, for example, when assessing over-fluidic status on dialysis. To reach expected errors below 4-5%, novel and individualized approaches must be developed to improve the accuracy of bioimpedance-based methods for the advent of innovative personalized health monitoring applications.

Bedside quantification of fat-free mass in acute spinal cord injury using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a psychometric study

“…Although BIS theoretically provides a better estimate of TBW and hence FFM, the purported improvement of BIS over BIA has been reported to be small [35]. In the present study, BIS LCW performed no better than single frequency predictors.…”

Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Challenges in Bioimpedance Devices for Healthcare Applications

“…in which the coefficients K i are determined by the multivariate linear regression analysis in the study population [133]. Normally, SFBIA equations use the resistance value at the frequency of 50 kHz [193], since this is the standardized frequency. The Table 1 shows some examples of equations based on the SFBIA method for different body compartments.…”

“…Clinical studies in which these devices have been used are limited by the small sample size [151] and additional research is needed with larger and more heterogeneous population samples, especially in obese individuals, subjects with low weight and in population groups with unique anthropometric characteristics or in altered states of composition [210]. To improve the error, innovative and individualized approaches must be developed to improve the accuracy of the bioimpedance methods [193].…”

Does A Controlled Diet Improve Cellulite?

“…30 This was not performed during the menstruation period to avoid the interference of fluid retention. 31,32…”