The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0453-4514(00)87111-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model under transaction costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the original Markowitz model forms a quadratic programming problem, following the initial works on its linear programming (LP) approximation [23,27], many attempts have been made to linearize the portfolio optimization procedure (c.f., [26] and references therein). The LP solvability is very important for applications to real-life financial decisions where the constructed portfolios have to meet numerous side constraints (including the minimum transaction lots [13]) and take into account transaction costs [11]. of the our LP computable models comparing their performances on the asset allocation problem while using historical values of 81 sectorial S&P500 indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the original Markowitz model forms a quadratic programming problem, following the initial works on its linear programming (LP) approximation [23,27], many attempts have been made to linearize the portfolio optimization procedure (c.f., [26] and references therein). The LP solvability is very important for applications to real-life financial decisions where the constructed portfolios have to meet numerous side constraints (including the minimum transaction lots [13]) and take into account transaction costs [11]. of the our LP computable models comparing their performances on the asset allocation problem while using historical values of 81 sectorial S&P500 indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare conditional value-at-risk and conditional drawdown-atrisk with more established mean-absolute deviation, maximum loss, and market-neutrality approaches. These risk management criteria allow for the formulation of linear portfolio rebalancing strategies and have proven their high efficiency in various portfolio management applications (Andersson et al [2001], Chekhlov et al [2000], Dembo and King [1992], Duarte [1999], Konno and Wijayanayake [1999], Konno and Yamazaki [1991], Palmquist et al [1999], Rockafellar andUryasev [2000, 2001], Ziemba and Mulvey [1998], Zenios [1999], and Young [1998]). The choice of hedge funds as a subject for the portfolio optimization strategy is stimulated by a strong interest in this class of assets, by both practitioners and scholars, due in part to their return properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Markowitz theory identifies risk with the volatility (standard deviation) of a portfolio. In the present study we investigate a portfolio optimization problem with five different constraints on risk, including conditional value-at-risk (Rockafellar andUryasev [2000, 2001]), conditional drawdown-at-risk (Chekhlov et al [1999]), mean-absolute deviation (Konno and Yamazaki [1991], Konno and Shirakawa [1994], Konno and Wijayanayake [1999]), maximum loss (Young [1998]), and market neutrality (beta of the portfolio equals zero). 3 The first two risk measures represent relatively new developments in the risk management field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• When transaction costs φ j (x j ) are assumed to be concave, then (3.65) is a linearly constrained convex minimization problem, which is in [72] solved using a branchand-bound algorithm. They test the model on data of up to 200 assets.…”
Section: Mad Under Transaction Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%