2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mealtime nonverbal behaviors in nursing home staff and residents with dementia: Behavioral analyses of videotaped observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emerging research is needed to characterise patterns of mealtime‐specific verbal and nonverbal dyadic interactions from both positive and negative perspectives and examine the association between person‐centred and task‐centred care and resident positive, neutral and challenging behaviours. Prior research characterised mealtime verbal and nonverbal behaviours of staff and residents from positive and negative perspectives using the refined CUED and videotaped observations (Liu, Perkhounkova, Williams, et al, 2022 ; Liu, Williams, et al, 2021 ). Findings show that 99% of verbal behaviours and 91% nonverbal behaviours from staff were positive compared to 85% verbal behaviours and 21% nonverbal behaviours from residents (Liu, Perkhounkova, Williams, et al, 2022 ; Liu, Williams, et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Emerging research is needed to characterise patterns of mealtime‐specific verbal and nonverbal dyadic interactions from both positive and negative perspectives and examine the association between person‐centred and task‐centred care and resident positive, neutral and challenging behaviours. Prior research characterised mealtime verbal and nonverbal behaviours of staff and residents from positive and negative perspectives using the refined CUED and videotaped observations (Liu, Perkhounkova, Williams, et al, 2022 ; Liu, Williams, et al, 2021 ). Findings show that 99% of verbal behaviours and 91% nonverbal behaviours from staff were positive compared to 85% verbal behaviours and 21% nonverbal behaviours from residents (Liu, Perkhounkova, Williams, et al, 2022 ; Liu, Williams, et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research characterised mealtime verbal and nonverbal behaviours of staff and residents from positive and negative perspectives using the refined CUED and videotaped observations (Liu, Perkhounkova, Williams, et al, 2022 ; Liu, Williams, et al, 2021 ). Findings show that 99% of verbal behaviours and 91% nonverbal behaviours from staff were positive compared to 85% verbal behaviours and 21% nonverbal behaviours from residents (Liu, Perkhounkova, Williams, et al, 2022 ; Liu, Williams, et al, 2021 ). There may be missed opportunities to better understand dyadic positive and challenging interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mealtime dyadic interactions are dynamic, complex, and fluid, involving a mixture of person-centered and task-centered care approaches by staff in responding to resident positive, neutral, and challenging behaviors, which further influences subsequent staff care approaches. Both staff person-centered and task-centered care approaches and resident positive, neutral, and challenging behaviors were frequently observed during mealtime care ( 11 , 17 , 18 ). Person-centered care (eg, orientation/giving instructions, giving choices; Supplementary Table 1 ) is defined as the individually tailored and directly delivered verbal and nonverbal assistance provided by staff that aims to engage and motivate residents in mealtime activities and address resident needs and preferences by accommodating resident remaining abilities, dyadic interactions, and the physical and social dining environments ( 19–21 ).…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with dementia in residential care settings (i.e., residents) often exhibit cognitive, functional, and behavioral challenges during mealtime such as disorientation to meal time/place, swallowing difficulties, and resistance to food/care, and require varied levels of support from staff [ 1 ]. Mealtime in residential care settings inherently involves dynamic environments, including the staff-resident dyad, as well as the care contexts with multilevel stimuli including meal-related items (e.g., food, drinks, silverware, utensils), other staff and residents, and the physical and social dining environments, which can be chaotic, distracting, and overstimulating for residents with dementia [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of language can be at different levels, including word (expression length, word diversity), syntax/sentence (syntactic complexity of sentences), speech (speech rate or intelligibility), and discourse (coherence and cohesion of conversations) [ 18 ]. While prior work on dyadic verbal and nonverbal communication behaviors during mealtimes and other activities primarily focused on the quantity (e.g., frequency of utterances and nonverbal behaviors) and quality (staff person-centered vs. task-centered behaviors; resident positive, neutral, vs. challenging behaviors; dyadic positive, neutral, vs. negative interactions) [ 1 , 2 , 19 , 20 ], less work has examined language characteristics itself at different levels during dyadic mealtime interactions. Evidence on language characteristics at word-, sentence-, speech- and discourse-levels as well as factors associated with language characteristics during mealtime interactions is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%