1986
DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(86)90252-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meal pattern analysis: artifacts, assumptions and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlation coefficients between meal size and pre-and post-meal intervals, meal duration, and the size of the following meal were not improved when longer meal criterion were used; this contrasted with the results of de Castro [7] and Castonguay et al [4] in rats. For this reason, a 2-min meal criterion was chosen to compare the correlation coefficients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Correlation coefficients between meal size and pre-and post-meal intervals, meal duration, and the size of the following meal were not improved when longer meal criterion were used; this contrasted with the results of de Castro [7] and Castonguay et al [4] in rats. For this reason, a 2-min meal criterion was chosen to compare the correlation coefficients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…These criteria include those reported to be most effective in separating the log-survivorship curve for interbout intervals into within-meal and between-meal intervals. Castonguay et al (14) found that a 10-min intermeal interval was shown to be the mean interval time between feeding episodes for rats that had >400 feeding intervals over a 7-d period (a similar time frame was used in our present study). In addition, we chose a 10-min intermeal interval because Castonguay et al (14) also found that the statistical relation between the intermeal interval and meal size is strengthened with longer end-of-themeal definitions.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The end of the meal was registered when there was >10 min without energy intake. These criteria are based on previous research by others (14), and we have tested them under a variety of feeding conditions (8,15). These criteria include those reported to be most effective in separating the log-survivorship curve for interbout intervals into within-meal and between-meal intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meal number, meal duration (s), meal size (g) and ingestion rate (g/min) were then determined. The food intake signal was analyzed as follows: a meal needed to be larger than 0.1 g and longer than 10 s and two distinct meals needed to be separated by an Inter Meal Interval (IMI) of 10 min [2,5,13]. We evaluated the data using different IMI (between 1 and 10 min) and this did not appreciably change the results (data not shown).…”
Section: Experiments 3: Meal Pattern Analysis After I3vt Administratiomentioning
confidence: 99%