2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2017.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MDRD or CKD-EPI for glomerular filtration rate estimation in living kidney donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in previous studies, a positive correlation was also found between total kidney volume and baseline eGFR 16,17 . In addition, similar positive correlation was observed between total kidney mGFR and baseline eGFR, in agreement with the results obtained by Burballa et al 18 . Total kidney volume also signi cantly correlated with total kidney mGFR similar to the report by Halleck et al 13 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As reported in previous studies, a positive correlation was also found between total kidney volume and baseline eGFR 16,17 . In addition, similar positive correlation was observed between total kidney mGFR and baseline eGFR, in agreement with the results obtained by Burballa et al 18 . Total kidney volume also signi cantly correlated with total kidney mGFR similar to the report by Halleck et al 13 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most recent international guideline on living kidney donor evaluation and care recommends using serum creatinine‐based estimating equations and then to “confirm” GFR via direct measurement techniques, creatinine clearance, combined serum creatinine‐cystatin C equations, or simply repeating serum creatinine‐based GFR estimation . We used the CKD‐EPI equation, which may underestimate measured GFR but has been shown to be more accurate than the MDRD equation in living kidney donors . In an earlier study that included much higher proportions of racial and ethnic minorities than our cohort, however, MDRD was found to perform better than CKD‐EPI .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Murata et al (15) reported that the creatinine-based eGFR/CKD-EPI demonstrated less bias than the eGFR/ MDRD in potential LKT donors (−8% vs. −18%). Burballa et al (16) and Gaillard et al (17) compared the values of the creatinine-based eGFR/CKD-EPI, eGFR/MDRD, and mGFR with isotopes in preoperative LKT donors and concluded that the eGFR/CKD-EPI correlated better with mGFR than did the eGFR/MDRD. Horio et al (18) compared the accuracy of the eGFR/Jm-CKD-EPI and eGFR/ Jm-MDRD with the measured inulin GFR in a health checkup population in Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%