2014
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.101170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MDM2 promotor polymorphism and disease characteristics in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of an individual patient data-based meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 21 Studies on gene variants or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for various genes showed variable associations of gene mutations with the sex of patients and did not find sex-specific functional consequences on response or survival. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Most often, sex-specific disparities are found and reported for the mutational status of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV) gene. Sex was differently distributed between the mutated (M) and unmutated (UM) subgroups, with men more likely showing UM IgHV ( P = 0.009), in addition to having a higher prevalence in the UM stereotyped BCR subsets (M : F between 1 and 4.4, P = 0.001, compared with 0.8 to 2.0 for the M stereotyped BCR subsets, P = 0.03).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 21 Studies on gene variants or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for various genes showed variable associations of gene mutations with the sex of patients and did not find sex-specific functional consequences on response or survival. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Most often, sex-specific disparities are found and reported for the mutational status of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgHV) gene. Sex was differently distributed between the mutated (M) and unmutated (UM) subgroups, with men more likely showing UM IgHV ( P = 0.009), in addition to having a higher prevalence in the UM stereotyped BCR subsets (M : F between 1 and 4.4, P = 0.001, compared with 0.8 to 2.0 for the M stereotyped BCR subsets, P = 0.03).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%