Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions

Abstract: Protein–protein Interactions are involved in most fundamental biological processes, with disease causing mutations enriched at their interfaces. Here we present mCSM-PPI2, a novel machine learning computational tool designed to more accurately predict the effects of missense mutations on protein–protein interaction binding affinity. mCSM-PPI2 uses graph-based structural signatures to model effects of variations on the inter-residue interaction network, evolutionary information, complex network metrics and ener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
326
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
326
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Column legend -Distance to Interface: The minimum distance of the wild-type residue to the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein as resolved in PDB 6vw1 9 . mCSM-PPI2 ΔΔG: The predicted ΔΔG in kcal/mol for the missense mutation calculated by mCSM-PPI2 12 with PDB 6vw1 as the model structure. Prediction: Our assessment of the effect of the variant on ACE2 binding to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein on the basis of whether predicted ΔΔG exceeds our calibration thresholds (see Methods) and our structural assessment of the modelled variant.…”
Section: Gnomad Variants In Ace2 Can Significantly Modify Its Affinitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Column legend -Distance to Interface: The minimum distance of the wild-type residue to the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein as resolved in PDB 6vw1 9 . mCSM-PPI2 ΔΔG: The predicted ΔΔG in kcal/mol for the missense mutation calculated by mCSM-PPI2 12 with PDB 6vw1 as the model structure. Prediction: Our assessment of the effect of the variant on ACE2 binding to SARS-CoV-2 S-protein on the basis of whether predicted ΔΔG exceeds our calibration thresholds (see Methods) and our structural assessment of the modelled variant.…”
Section: Gnomad Variants In Ace2 Can Significantly Modify Its Affinitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation hinges on mCSM-PPI2 providing predicted ΔΔG that is unbiased. It is conceivable that mCSM-PPI2 could be biased towards negative ΔΔG predictions because the training datasets are skewed towards these observations 12,23 . Fortunately, the mCSM-PPI2 training data were augmented to mitigate this possibility 12 and our own analyses of this bias in the ACE2 SARS-CoV S complex suggests that although the magnitudes of positive predictions can be depressed, overall the predictions are well-balanced (see Methods).…”
Section: More Mutations In Ace2 Would Reduce Ace2-s Affinity Than Incmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many efforts to computationally predict and model the effects of missense mutations on protein stability and protein-protein interactions have been made that help uncover the relationships between genotype and phenotype (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). However, predicting the impacts of mutations on protein-nucleic acid interactions has been more intractable and very few methods have been proposed that can do this (26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, instead of analyzing each hotspot individually as is commonly done in cancer driver mutation prediction [26][27][28][29] , we connect the effects of all hotspots to construct a hotspot-affected interactome network at the full proteome scale. Such network has not been possible to construct in any previous studies since interactome-based approaches suffered from either low coverage (i.e., focusing on only interactions with cocrystal structures) [30][31][32][33] or low resolution (i.e., examining (sub-)network properties at the protein level, not the residue level) [34][35][36][37] . We show utilities of our innovative hotspot-affected interactome network in uncovering novel relationships among different hotspots, generating hypotheses of how hotspot mutations function at the molecular level, and identifying novel oncogenic proteins that do not harbor hotspot mutations themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%