2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mCRE-based parameter identification from full-field measurements: Consistent framework, integrated version, and extension to nonlinear material behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noticing in (19) that the parameters are updated following the computation of the gradient in the whole structure and not only where there is a measurement.…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noticing in (19) that the parameters are updated following the computation of the gradient in the whole structure and not only where there is a measurement.…”
Section: Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researches dealing with mCRE have been conducted, involving forced vibrations dynamics, [13][14][15] transient dynamics 16,17 and nonlinear material behavior. 18,19 Additionally, the mCRE framework has proved its robustness to corrupted 20 and noisy 21 measurements. The classical mCRE approach, as other inversion methods, postulates a constitutive model (even though it is released to inform on possible bias), which has the advantage of being physically interpretable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the previously introduced mCRE-based model updating strategy is deterministic, one can show that this procedure is equivalent to the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation in the Bayesian inference framework with Gaussian distributions, an error norm based on the measurement error covariance matrix, and no a priori on parameters [73,74]. Since covariance on the modeling error is usually not known, the idea is to integrate modeling error in a different manner into Bayesian inference, in a more global and less strict framework that allows more flexibility in the model structure.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Mcre From A Bayesian Viewpointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation occurs in the in vivo determination of the stress resultants in non-axisymmetric biological membranes [5,18], in the stress monitoring of civil and mechanical shell structures [1] and in bulge (also known as diaphragm or inflation) tests, an experimental procedure used to characterize the biaxial response and identify the material parameters through the inflation of planar membranes or thin shells subjected to a uniform pressure [19][20][21]. In these applications, the stress determination relies on the full-field assessment of the deformed configuration through digital image correlation [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%