McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope for insertion of a transoesophageal echocardiography probe

Abstract

BACKGROUNDTransoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) probe insertion in anaesthetised patients can cause pharyngeal and oesophageal injuries. Kim et al. have shown that insertion assisted by a Macintosh laryngoscope can reduce such complications but it may sometimes be difficult to observe the passage of a TOE probe. The McGRATH MAC (McGRATH) has been shown to provide a better view of the glottis, piriform fossa and oesophageal inlet during tracheal intubation than the Macintosh.OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that the McGRATH provided better visualisation of the oesophageal inlet and was useful as an aid to TOE probe placement, possibly reducing the incidence of pharyngeal injury related to insertion, compared with the Macintosh.DESIGNA randomised controlled trial.SETTINGThe study was conducted in a university hospital from February to December 2014.PATIENTSOne hundred patients undergoing elective surgery under intraoperative TOE monitoring were randomised to either a Macintosh group or a McGRATH group.INTERVENTIONSMacintosh and McGRATH were used to visualise the passage of the TOE probe and guide its insertion.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESVisibility of the oesophageal inlet, the number of TOE insertion attempts and incidence of pharyngeal mucosal injury after the TOE probe had been removed were assessed.RESULTSThe percentage of patients in whom the oesophageal inlet was visible was higher in the McGRATH group (88%) than in the Macintosh group (41%) (P < 0.01). The number of TOE probe insertion attempts was significantly smaller in the McGRATH group than in the Macintosh group (P = 0.039). The incidence of pharyngeal mucosal injury was significantly smaller in the McGRATH group (4%) than in the Macintosh group (16%; P = 0.042).CONCLUSIONThe McGRATH provided a better view of the oesophageal inlet and was useful as an aid to TOE probe placement, possibly reducing the incidence of pharyngeal injury related to its insertion.TRIAL REGISTRATIONUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN) 000012970.

Complications related to peri‐operative transoesophageal echocardiography – a one‐year prospective national audit by the Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care

“…The use of insertion aids, such as a laryngoscope, may reduce the incidence of oropharyngeal mucosal injury, odynophagia and the number of insertion attempts . The risk of complications may be further reduced by the use of a videolaryngoscope as the oesophageal inlet may be better visualised, however, there is little evidence yet to support this suggestion . Finally, we argue there should be more focus on teaching and sharing safe probe insertion techniques.…”

Comparison of a curved forceps with a conventional straight forceps for nasogastric tube insertion under videolaryngoscopic guidance

“…Indeed, it has been reported that McG decreased the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal complications associated with the insertion of a transesophageal echocardiography probe. [ 15 ]…”

Videolaryngoscopy, the Current Role in Airway Management

“…Videolaryngoscopy can be particularly useful for guiding and correcting malposition of different devices through oropharynx such as nasogastric or orogastric tube [49], esophagoscopes, gastroscopes, or transesophageal echocardiography probe [50]. In addition, it can be useful when placing throat packs in oral and maxillofacial surgery.…”