2013
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2012.689062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

McDonald's ωt, Cronbach's α, and Generalized θ for Composite Reliability of Common Factors Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After data collection, the internal consistency of items in Sections 4 and 5 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach α coefficients. 11 The items in Section 4 were selected for subsequent principal component analysis (PCA). 12 Sampling adequacy was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After data collection, the internal consistency of items in Sections 4 and 5 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach α coefficients. 11 The items in Section 4 were selected for subsequent principal component analysis (PCA). 12 Sampling adequacy was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency was assessed using both Cronbach α and McDonald ω coefficients [ 52 , 53 ]. Cronbach α is the most widely used measure of reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach α is the most widely used measure of reliability. However, it overestimates the true composite reliability and is negatively biased when used to measure the reliability of ordinal variables [52,54]. Given the ordinal response format of USEQ items, McDonald ω was used to overcome these limitations, providing a more accurate approximation of the scale reliability [55].…”
Section: Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also reported higher reliability for language domain-specific grit than domain-general grit [t(190)=84.34, p <0.001, Cohen’s d=0.81]. All the items of the scale were measured using a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 “not at all like me” to 5 “very much like me.” We used Cronbach’s α to assess its internal consistency and McDonald’s ω ( McDonald, 1985 , 1999 ) to check its composite reliability Şimşek and Noyan (2013) . Cronbach’s α (95% CI) for the CI, PE, and the global L2 grit was 0.90 (0.89–0.92), 0.89 (0.88–0.90), and 0.88 (0.87–0.90), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%