2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online versus face-to-face instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Hamilton y Scandura (2003) It is important to compensate the loss of social presence in e-mentoring with alternatives that are close to synchronous communication, since the poverty of the medium impacts especially on the participation of the mentee (Shpigelman et al, 2009). Students that prefer face-to-face interaction are more likely to benefit from auditory components and communication platforms that allow emotions to be conveyed (Harrington and Loffredo, 2010). This can be facilitated with tools for video conferencing or chat or through the use of mobile technology (Harley et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Hamilton y Scandura (2003) It is important to compensate the loss of social presence in e-mentoring with alternatives that are close to synchronous communication, since the poverty of the medium impacts especially on the participation of the mentee (Shpigelman et al, 2009). Students that prefer face-to-face interaction are more likely to benefit from auditory components and communication platforms that allow emotions to be conveyed (Harrington and Loffredo, 2010). This can be facilitated with tools for video conferencing or chat or through the use of mobile technology (Harley et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these views, there is a substantial body of knowledge indicating that those individuals who are isolated, stigmatized, or lack of support in the real world may be especially motivated to participate and can derivate higher returns on interventions offering help via CMC (Shpigelman et al, 2009). However, given the unique characteristics of CMC, ementoring may be less effective for those with a strong preference for extroverted social contact or a need for connectedness (Harrington and Loffredo, 2010;Nemetz et al, 2011). …”
Section: The Psychosocial Dimension Of E-mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used as a framework by some researchers in ID a distance and online mode (Harrington & Loffredo, 2010). The indicators expressed in this theory make it more helpful in exploring students' experiences in ID of mathematics at the university.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New challenges are also emerging, such as how ODL institutions can enhance their distance and online delivery in an environment that is becoming more and more diverse, thus creating new areas for research investigation (Bertini, 2016). Prior studies have identified lack of instructors' competence to deliver quality instruction to establish meaningful educational experiences for the learners as one of the basic barriers of distance and online learning (Harrington & Loffredo, 2010). The overall aim of this paper is to examine students' experiences in ID in an undergraduate mathematics course at two ODL universities in Nigeria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of each learner's preference presented in Table 4, pertaining to education and learning, were collated from the literature [4,13,14,24,43]. − Seldom makes errors of facts.…”
Section: Adaptive Educational Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%