2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MBL2 and FCN2 gene polymorphisms in a cohort of Italian children with rheumatic fever: A case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, clinicians must con rm adherence of those patients to secondary prophylaxis intervention [58]. Actually, secondary prophylaxis adherence of RF patients is typically poor, especially in young people which was perceived as the principal explanation for RF repeats and RHD advancement [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, clinicians must con rm adherence of those patients to secondary prophylaxis intervention [58]. Actually, secondary prophylaxis adherence of RF patients is typically poor, especially in young people which was perceived as the principal explanation for RF repeats and RHD advancement [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients carrying the FCN2 A polymorphism at -4 may be at major risk of recurrences having a higher probability to evolve in RHD. As a consequence, these patients should be carefully monitored and clinicians should consider the risks of secondary prophylaxis interruption [33]. Indeed, adherence to secondary prophylaxis for RF is usually poor, particularly in adolescents, and this is regarded as the main cause of RF recurrences and of RHD development [33, 34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, these patients should be carefully monitored and clinicians should consider the risks of secondary prophylaxis interruption [33]. Indeed, adherence to secondary prophylaxis for RF is usually poor, particularly in adolescents, and this is regarded as the main cause of RF recurrences and of RHD development [33, 34]. By focusing on the FCN haplotypes, a significantly higher haplotype frequency of -602/-4 G/A was observed in total RF compared to the controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, early identi cation, careful monitoring should be given for those patients. Furthermore, clinicians must con rm adherence of those patients to secondary prophylaxis intervention [38]. In fact, secondary prophylaxis adherence of RF patients is typically poor, especially in young people which was perceived as the principal explanation for RF repeats and RHD advancement [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%