2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0273(00)00313-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mayon volcano, Philippines: change of monitoring strategy after microgravity and GPS measurements from 1992 to 1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the observed gravity changes N94-N92 considered for the source modelling. The a priori mean standard deviation for the gravity data in Table 1 is 9.4 lGal, but a more realistic value of 12 lGal is suggested by JENTZSCH et al (2001). Apart from considering one or several sources (positive and/or negative), a uniform change for seasonal variations and the effect of a laminar body can be tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the observed gravity changes N94-N92 considered for the source modelling. The a priori mean standard deviation for the gravity data in Table 1 is 9.4 lGal, but a more realistic value of 12 lGal is suggested by JENTZSCH et al (2001). Apart from considering one or several sources (positive and/or negative), a uniform change for seasonal variations and the effect of a laminar body can be tested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. Camacho et al Pure appl. geophys., Table 2 Some results for the fit of seven possible models ( The data accuracy level (12 lGal according to JENTZSCH et al, 2001) does not allow us to distinguish between the models. Nevertheless, interesting conclusions can be drawn from the source models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Mogi model has been extensively applied in modeling ground deformations in volcanic areas and has been successful primarily in explaining the vertical component of the ground deformations. However, this model often poses difficulties in simultaneously modeling all components of the observed displacements in conjunction with gravity changes (KISSLINGER, 1975;RYMER et al, 1993;RYMER, 1996), and there is a large body of evidence for ground deformations and seismicity at calderas and other volcanic areas that cannot be modeled by these purely elastic effects (e.g., EGGERS, 1987;BERRINO and CORRADO, 1991;BONAFEDE, 1991;RYMER et al, 1993;DE NATALE et al, 1997;GAETA et al, 1998;JAHR et al, 1998;WATANABE et al, 1998;JENTZSCH et al, 2001b;PRITCHARD and SIMONS, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%