2022
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mayo imaging classification is a good predictor of rapid progress among Korean patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: results from the KNOW-CKD study

Abstract: Background: Mayo imaging classification (MIC) is a useful biomarker to predict disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). This study was performed to validate MIC in the prediction of renal outcome in a prospective Korean AD-PKD cohort and evaluate clinical parameters associated with rapid disease progression. Methods: A total of 178 ADPKD patients were enrolled and prospectively observed for an average duration of 6.2 ± 1.9 years. Rapid progressor was defined as MIC 1C throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co. Ltd.) to identify the rapid progressors among ADPKD patients. Mayo imaging classification is currently the best prediction model for selecting rapid progressors among ADPKD patients and is also a good predictor for Korean ADPKD population [ 10 ]. The SaaS included uploading of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images for TKV measurement, and other variables including age, sex, race, height, serum creatinine, and genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co. Ltd.) to identify the rapid progressors among ADPKD patients. Mayo imaging classification is currently the best prediction model for selecting rapid progressors among ADPKD patients and is also a good predictor for Korean ADPKD population [ 10 ]. The SaaS included uploading of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images for TKV measurement, and other variables including age, sex, race, height, serum creatinine, and genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the assessment of age and height-adjusted TKV could support the classification of kidney growth curves. It is usually divided into five categories from 1A to 1E based on the mayo classification, and patients with 1C-1E are generally regarded as a rapid progressors [15][16][17]. In this regard, the Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of ADPKD and Its Outcomes (TEMPO) 3:4 study, a landmark trial of tolvaptan, aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tolvaptan with the annual rate of change in TKV and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope.…”
Section: Impact Of Tolvaptan On Total Kidney Volume (Tkv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 MIC categories are associated with kidney function decline and kidney failure in several ADPKD cohorts, including Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and its Outcomes, 8 HALT Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease-PKD, 9,10 and KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients With CKD. 11 In the original publication, the MIC was externally validated in a relatively small cohort of 173 participants of the Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies in Polycystic Kidney Disease study from the same region as the development cohort. 7 The widespread use of this classification makes it essential to validate its predictive capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 MIC categories are associated with kidney function decline and kidney failure in several ADPKD cohorts, including Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and its Outcomes, 8 HALT Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease-PKD, 9,10 and KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients With CKD. 11…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%