2017
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4341.3.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mayflies of the genus Epeorus Eaton, 1881 s.l. (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) from the Caucasus Mountains: a new species of Caucasiron Kluge, 1997 from Georgia and Turkey

Abstract: The new species Epeorus (Caucasiron) bicolliculatus sp. nov. is described based on larvae and adults. Diagnostic characters are given with regard to the related species. The most pronounced difference is represented by protuberances on larval abdominal terga II-IX, present exclusively in E. (C.) bicolliculatus sp. nov. Primary data on the biology and distribution of the new species are also provided. Delimitation of the new species is verified by the analysis of COI (barcode) sequences. Barcode data for all Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 814 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Original descriptions of individual species were used for the initial species identification based on morphology (Sinitshenkova 1976;Braasch 1978Braasch , 1979Braasch , 1980Braasch and Zimmerman 1979;Braasch and Soldán 1979;Hrivniak et al 2017Hrivniak et al , 2019Hrivniak et al , 2020a. Due to insufficient details given in several of these descriptions, newly collected specimens (both larvae mounted on slides and larvae stored in ethanol) were compared with the type material (holotypes and/or paratypes) to accurately identify the species.…”
Section: Morphological Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Original descriptions of individual species were used for the initial species identification based on morphology (Sinitshenkova 1976;Braasch 1978Braasch , 1979Braasch , 1980Braasch and Zimmerman 1979;Braasch and Soldán 1979;Hrivniak et al 2017Hrivniak et al , 2019Hrivniak et al , 2020a. Due to insufficient details given in several of these descriptions, newly collected specimens (both larvae mounted on slides and larvae stored in ethanol) were compared with the type material (holotypes and/or paratypes) to accurately identify the species.…”
Section: Morphological Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available identification keys deal with selected genera only (Sinitshenkova 1976: Epeorus Eaton, 1881and Rhithrogena Eaton, 1882Jacob andZimmerman 1978: Baetis Leach, 1815) or mayfly fauna of the wider region without sufficient information on Caucasian species specifically (Kluge 1997a). These keys are largely outdated, because the number of species newly described from the Caucasus has been steadily increasing in recent years (e.g., Hrivniak et al 2017;2019;2020a;Martynov and Godunko 2017;Bojková et al 2018). Therefore, the identification of larvae to the species level is complicated due to the necessity of compiling information from original descriptions and requires advanced experience with the taxonomy of mayflies and comparative collections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations