Maydos Kilisetepe Höyüğü M.Ö. 2. Binyıl Yerleşim Özellikleri

Mutlu, Meral Başaran

doi:10.18069/firatsbed.486363

“…3. binyıldan M.S. 20. yüzyıla kadar iskân gördüğü ortaya konmuştur (Sazcı 2012a;2012b;2014;2015;2016; Chabot-Aslan ve Sazcı 2016;Sazcı ve Başaran-Mutlu 2017;2018a-b;Başaran-Mutlu 2018a). Yakın geçmişe kadar Kuzeybatı Anadolu'nun tarih öncesi hakkındaki bilgiler Troia yerleşmesinden gelirken (Blegen vd.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Höyüğü M.Ö. 2. Bi̇nyil Yerleşi̇m Özelli̇kleri̇

Mutlu¹

2019

Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Self Cite

1

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZÇanakkale Boğazı'nın Avrupa yakasında yer alan Maydos Kilisetepe Höyüğü'nde 2010 yılından günümüze kadar yapılan kazılarda ağırlıklı olarak Tunç Çağı'na tarihlenen sekiz tabaka tespit edilmiştir ve henüz ana kayaya ulaşılamamıştır. M.Ö. 2. binyıl boyunca kesintisiz bir tabakalanmaya sahip olan höyüğün kazısı yapılan alanlarında yerleşim şeması, mimari gelenekleri ve yenilikleri, savunma ve özel işlevli yapıları hakkında bilgi edinilmiştir. Tabakaların başlangıç ve bitiş zamanları ile Troia tabakaları arasında kısmen bir paralellik olduğu tespit edilmiştir. M.Ö. 2. binyıla ait üst üste kurulan dört yerleşimin de planlaması Batı Anadolu'dan bilinen Anadolu Yerleşim Şeması'nın bir devamı niteliğindedir. M.Ö. 2. binyılın başlarında Maydos'un seramik ve küçük buluntuları Kuzeybatı Anadolu özellikleri gösterirken devam eden süreçte Balkanlardaki kültürlerle girilen ilişkinin bir sonucu olarak bu özelliklerin azaldığı anlaşılmıştır. Maydos ile Batı Anadolu, Ege, Orta ve Güneydoğu Avrupa kültürleri arasında kurulan kültürel bağlantılar, Kuzeybatı Anadolu'nun tarihöncesi bilgilerinin yeniden değerlendirilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır.Anahtar Kelimeler: Tunç Çağı, Çanakkale Boğazı, mimari, savunma yapıları, özel işlevli yapılar. ABSTRACTIn the excavations of Maydos-Kilisetepe mound on the European side of the Dardanelles since 2010, eight layers have so far been identified dating from the Bronze Age onwards, even though the bedrock has not yet been reached. The excavated areas yielded a continuous stratification throughout the 2nd millennium, as well as information about the settlement scheme, architectural traditions and innovations, defense and special structures was obtained. It has been confirmed that there is a partially parallelism between Troy and Maydos in terms of the beginning and ending times of the layers. The planning of the four settlements of the 2nd millennium BC is a continuation of the Anatolian Settlement Scheme known from Western Anatolia. While at the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC, the Maydos ceramic and small finds were under the influence of Northwest Anatolia, at the ongoing process, these characteristics have been seen to decrease as a result of the relationship with the cultures in the Balkans. The cultural links between Maydos and Western Anatolia, Aegean, Central and Southeast European cultures allow the re-evaluation of prehistoric knowledge of Northwest Anatolia.

show abstract

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Tunç Çaği Topuz Başi Taslaklari: Ti̇poloji̇ Ve Mekânsal Kullanim Üzeri̇ne Değerlendi̇rmeler

MUTLU¹,

BAMYACI²

2020

Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Between the 3rd millennium BC and the end of 2nd millennium at five different levels at Maydos Kilisetepe, the vast majority of spherical stone objects significantly revealed. In the first place, they were considered as simple utilitarian hammer stones in which the works such as pounding, crushing or percussion tasks can be performed at daily activities. In contrast, it is seen in the detailed examinations that they are not produced from durable raw materials such as basalt, gabbro etc. They all produced from various sedimentary rocks mostly marble, which is not suitable for heavy-duty works such as hammering and pounding. The fact that most of these rough-shaped spherical stones have concave shallow pits and deliberate drilling marks at opposite poles suggests that the finds could be some kind of unfinished stone tools. These objects reflects the possibility of continuity in production via spatial distribution analysis which are found in the same locus with the stone tools used in possible production sequences. According to the andesite, basalt and marble raw material selection and the morphological characteristics, these objects considered as some kind of prestige and status rather than a functional utilitarian tools. This study also summarize the typological development of mace heads found in Anatolia and questioned the reason of why Maydos which is very accessible site near to the cultural interactions zone, continue to produce the same typological mace heads as some kind of prestige and status object nearly a thousand year.

show abstract

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Tunç Çaği Topuz Başi Taslaklari: Ti̇poloji̇ Ve Mekânsal Kullanim Üzeri̇ne Değerlendi̇rmeler

Mutlu

¹

,

Bamyaci

²

2020

Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Between the 3rd millennium BC and the end of 2nd millennium at five different levels at Maydos Kilisetepe, the vast majority of spherical stone objects significantly revealed. In the first place, they were considered as simple utilitarian hammer stones in which the works such as pounding, crushing or percussion tasks can be performed at daily activities. In contrast, it is seen in the detailed examinations that they are not produced from durable raw materials such as basalt, gabbro etc. They all produced from various sedimentary rocks mostly marble, which is not suitable for heavy-duty works such as hammering and pounding. The fact that most of these rough-shaped spherical stones have concave shallow pits and deliberate drilling marks at opposite poles suggests that the finds could be some kind of unfinished stone tools. These objects reflects the possibility of continuity in production via spatial distribution analysis which are found in the same locus with the stone tools used in possible production sequences. According to the andesite, basalt and marble raw material selection and the morphological characteristics, these objects considered as some kind of prestige and status rather than a functional utilitarian tools. This study also summarize the typological development of mace heads found in Anatolia and questioned the reason of why Maydos which is very accessible site near to the cultural interactions zone, continue to produce the same typological mace heads as some kind of prestige and status object nearly a thousand year.

show abstract

Maydos Kilisetepe Höyüğü M.Ö. 2. Binyıl Yerleşim Özellikleri

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Höyüğü M.Ö. 2. Bi̇nyil Yerleşi̇m Özelli̇kleri̇

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Höyüğü M.Ö. 2. Bi̇nyil Yerleşi̇m Özelli̇kleri̇

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Tunç Çaği Topuz Başi Taslaklari: Ti̇poloji̇ Ve Mekânsal Kullanim Üzeri̇ne Değerlendi̇rmeler

Maydos Ki̇li̇setepe Tunç Çaği Topuz Başi Taslaklari: Ti̇poloji̇ Ve Mekânsal Kullanim Üzeri̇ne Değerlendi̇rmeler

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About