2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00147-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
302
10
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 497 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
44
302
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In central vision, the first modulation due to the emotional content of the picture was observed earlier than 100 ms on parieto-occipital areas. This kind of effect was already described in this latency range but rarely on the peak of the P100 itself [15,52]. In far peripheral vision (+30°and -30°), the earliest emotional influence was observed in the contralateral occipital area, after 120 ms, i.e.…”
Section: Effects Of Emotion On Early Visual Erpssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In central vision, the first modulation due to the emotional content of the picture was observed earlier than 100 ms on parieto-occipital areas. This kind of effect was already described in this latency range but rarely on the peak of the P100 itself [15,52]. In far peripheral vision (+30°and -30°), the earliest emotional influence was observed in the contralateral occipital area, after 120 ms, i.e.…”
Section: Effects Of Emotion On Early Visual Erpssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Indeed, using experimental material presented in central vision, it has been demonstrated that emotional stimuli, especially unpleasant ones, are preferentially processed in comparison with neutral stimuli [14,15]. Moreover, emotional stimuli are better remembered [16][17][18], and can modulate early [19] and late [20] evoked components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For emotional stimuli used by psychologists (e.g., snakes; emotional faces) the processing capacities of the low route would appear to be inadequate (see Rolls, 1999;Smith, Cacioppo, Larsen, & Chartrand, 2003, for similar concerns). But, the low route is still cited to help explain particular affective phenomena (e.g., Bargh, 1997;Berkowitz & Harmon-Jones, 2004;Zajonc, 2000).…”
Section: Assessing Three Hypotheses About Affect and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, negative attributes exert greater influence on judgments and persuasion (Herr, Kardes, & Kim, 1991); negative traits have greater influence on forming an impression of another person (Peeters & Czapinski, 1990); and negative information has a greater impact on evaluative categorizations than does positive information (Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson, 1997;Ito, Larsen, Smith, & Cacioppo, 1998). These effects often rely on the fact that negative information has a strong attention-capturing quality: Negative stimuli are detected faster (Dijksterhuis & Aarts, 2003), draw more attention (Pratto & John, 1991;Smith, Cacioppo, Larsen, & Chartrand, 2003), and are more difficult to divert attention from (McKenna & Sharma, 1995;Pratto & John, 1991). Thus, the research literature leads to the strong prediction that negative outcomes (as compared with positive outcomes) will command more attention in moment-bymoment comprehension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%