1995
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(94)00625-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxwell-Bloch modelocking instabilities in erbium-doped fiber lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The history of the multimode Risken-Nummedal-Graham-Haken (RNGH) instability started in 1968. Since then, the extensive theoretical and experimental study of Er-doped fiber lasers revealed decreased second lasing threshold to the values slightly exceeding the value for the first threshold [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, there is still an issue related to the accounting for the vector nature of the fiber laser dynamics which it typically present in the experiments on RNGH instability [14,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The history of the multimode Risken-Nummedal-Graham-Haken (RNGH) instability started in 1968. Since then, the extensive theoretical and experimental study of Er-doped fiber lasers revealed decreased second lasing threshold to the values slightly exceeding the value for the first threshold [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, there is still an issue related to the accounting for the vector nature of the fiber laser dynamics which it typically present in the experiments on RNGH instability [14,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulse width is also much longer than the time of transverse relaxation of 160 fs. For this reason, the dynamics of the medium polarization was also ignored [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for such pulsations might be the Risken-Nummedal-Graham-Haken instability [2,3]. An analysis of experimental data to confirm this hypothesis is in progress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We then neglect 33 in the equations for 11 and 00 and replace ␥ 23 33 by R 00 in the equation for 22 ‫ץ‬ t Im 12 ϭϪ␥ Ќ Im 12 ϩEd, ͑B16͒ c‫ץ‬ z Eϩ‫ץ‬ t Eϭg Im 12 . ͑B17͒…”
Section: Appendix B: Four-level Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%