1997
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1997.15.1.310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Abstract: This study estimates a phase II starting dose of gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients to be 2,400 mg/m2/wk for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks; this is much higher than that previously reported in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with advanced NSCLC achieved a partial response to gemcitabine. This significant activity in conjunction with a very favorable toxicity profile supports the further evaluation of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the clinical effectiveness for the treatment of lung or breast cancer with cytosine nucleoside analogues, such as Ara-C 15 and the new promising agents, dFdC 16 and 5-AZACdR 17 is limited by their hematopoietic toxicity. The efficacy of chemotherapy with these analogues would be improved if their dose-dependent myelotoxicity could be circumvented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the clinical effectiveness for the treatment of lung or breast cancer with cytosine nucleoside analogues, such as Ara-C 15 and the new promising agents, dFdC 16 and 5-AZACdR 17 is limited by their hematopoietic toxicity. The efficacy of chemotherapy with these analogues would be improved if their dose-dependent myelotoxicity could be circumvented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Myelosuppression constitutes a major limiting factor for the utilization of high doses of these analogues in cancer therapy. [14][15][16][17] In previous studies, we purified, cloned and expressed the human CD cDNA. 18 We demonstrated increased resistance to Ara-C, 19,20 dFdC and 5-AZA-CdR 21,22 in murine fibroblasts following retroviral gene transfer of CD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of gemcitabine on transaminases is well described and is a dose limiting toxicity at higher doses of gemcitabine (Fossella et al, 1997). Liver enzymes returned to normal by 6 months post-chemotherapy in all bar one EC-T patient with an abnormal AST and four patients (2 EC-T, 2EC-GT) with abnormal ALT levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A randomized phase II study by Tempero et al [81] in 92 patients with pancreatic cancer compared standard infusion (2,200 mg/m 2 in 30 minutes) with an FDR infusion (1,500 mg/m 2 in 150 minutes) of gemcitabine. The dose levels for each dosing regimen were based on the established MTD for gemcitabine in previous studies [61,82,83], which permitted comparison of clinical responses at equitoxic gemcitabine doses between the two dosing schedules. They found that the concentration of dFdCTP in PBMCs increased linearly with the infusion time up to 188 M at the end of the 150-minute infusion, while infusion of the higher dose in 30 minutes resulted in a plateau in the dFdCTP concentration of 103 M at 1 hour after the end of the infusion.…”
Section: Phase Ii/iii Randomized Trials Comparing Fdr With Standard Dmentioning
confidence: 99%