2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Standard Uptake Value of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes on Integrated FDG-PET-CT Predicts Pathology in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
119
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
119
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hellwig et al [13] preferred to use 2.5 as cutoff value, instead of 4.5 as their best accuracy, in order to reduce the FN results. In our study the cutoff value for SUVmax determined from the ROC curve was 5.96, which was still in the range of the finding from other studies varying from 4.2 to 6.2 [31][32][33][34], although our study only focused on adenocarcinoma of the lung subjects. The accuracy of CV and SUVmax were similar (83.0 vs 80.9), but the correlation between them was only moderate (R 2 0.4237; calculation is not shown), meaning there were cases of pathology-proven metastatic LNs having a negative finding of SUVmax but positive finding of CV, and also benign LNs having a positive finding of SUV but with a negative finding of CV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Hellwig et al [13] preferred to use 2.5 as cutoff value, instead of 4.5 as their best accuracy, in order to reduce the FN results. In our study the cutoff value for SUVmax determined from the ROC curve was 5.96, which was still in the range of the finding from other studies varying from 4.2 to 6.2 [31][32][33][34], although our study only focused on adenocarcinoma of the lung subjects. The accuracy of CV and SUVmax were similar (83.0 vs 80.9), but the correlation between them was only moderate (R 2 0.4237; calculation is not shown), meaning there were cases of pathology-proven metastatic LNs having a negative finding of SUVmax but positive finding of CV, and also benign LNs having a positive finding of SUV but with a negative finding of CV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Values identified in these studies included 4.4 and 5.3, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 92% and 98%, respectively. [16,17] Although our post-hoc analysis of proposed SUVmax cut-offs suggested that a cut-off of 4.5 conferred an improvement in diagnostic accuracy from 64.0% to 84.7% compared with a cut-off of 2.5, it came at the cost of decreasing the sensitivity from 95.7% to 80.0% and the NPV from 90.6% to 83.5%. As PET-CT is used to exclude mediastinal spread rather than diagnose it, the reduction in NPV renders the cut-off of 4.5 less appropriate for clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It was therefore subsequently compared with the value identified by the ROC curve with regard to sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy. [16] …”
Section: Statistical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBUS could synergistically complement our system's guidance, but further miniaturization of the EBUS device would be necessary for them to be feasible at peripheral sites. Positron emission tomography (PET) and the recent innovation of combined PET-CT scanners adds yet another tool for procedure planning [61][62][63]. While researchers assert that PET can specifically identify positive cancer sites, its inherent low resolution limits its diagnostic capability for small lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%