2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00030-004-2001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum principle and existence of Lp-viscosity solutions for fully nonlinear uniformly elliptic equations with measurable and quadratic terms

Abstract: We study L p -viscosity solutions of fully nonlinear, second-order, uniformly elliptic partial differential equations (PDE) with measurable terms and quadratic nonlinearity. We present a sufficient condition under which the maximum principle holds for L p -viscosity solution. We also prove stability and existence results for the equations under consideration.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 49L25, 35J60, 35D10.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When m > 1, we will show that the maximum principle holds provided that µ or f is small enough in a certain norm. This will generalize a result of [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When m > 1, we will show that the maximum principle holds provided that µ or f is small enough in a certain norm. This will generalize a result of [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is known that the maximum principle fails in general for such equations in the elliptic case. In [15] an example was given for the equation − u − µ|Du| 2 = C 0 in B 1 with certain constants µ, C 0 > 0, where B r = {y ∈ R n : |y| < r } for r > 0. Below we present a counter-example for which the maximum principle fails even when the PDE has any super-linear nonlinearity with respect to Du.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such result has been extended in the case m > 1 of superlinear growth in the gradient by Koike-Świȩch [11]. In order to get the following ABP-estimates, deduced by [11, Theorems 3.1-3.2], we also need the restriction m ≤ 2.…”
Section: Proof By Contradiction Assume That There Existmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the growth is concerned, we have uniqueness, for instance if m = 2 and s > 2 provided (1.15) holds for some ρ < 2(s−2) s . The continuity of f ensures that the two notions of L n -viscosity solutions and classical viscosity solutions are equivalent, see [13]. For further comments about the assumptions, see Section 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%