2015
DOI: 10.17533/udea.redin.n75a08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum power point tracking in PV systems based on adaptive control and sliding mode control

Abstract: Maximum power point tracking in PV systems based on adaptive control and sliding mode control Seguimiento del máximo punto de potencia en sistemas fotovoltaicos basado en control adaptativo y un control en modos deslizantes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Figure 11 shows the auto-tuning of the controller parameters, k p and k i , and the resulting change in the settling time of the PV voltage and in the disturbance period of the P&O algorithm; all of which improves the system performance for each condition. With the aim of illustrating the performance improvement provided by the proposed solution, Figure 12 shows the comparison between the dynamic responses of the P&O solution based on a traditional PI controller an adaptive MRAC-SMCC controller (Ortiz-Valencia et al, 2015), and the proposed adaptive PI-SMCC solution.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Figure 11 shows the auto-tuning of the controller parameters, k p and k i , and the resulting change in the settling time of the PV voltage and in the disturbance period of the P&O algorithm; all of which improves the system performance for each condition. With the aim of illustrating the performance improvement provided by the proposed solution, Figure 12 shows the comparison between the dynamic responses of the P&O solution based on a traditional PI controller an adaptive MRAC-SMCC controller (Ortiz-Valencia et al, 2015), and the proposed adaptive PI-SMCC solution.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the experience-based design of the Fuzzy component, the desired operation is ensured around the tested conditions only. A similar approach was introduced in (Ortiz-Valencia et al, 2015), which is based in the cascade operation of a sliding mode current controller (SMCC) and a model reference adaptive controller (MRAC): The SMCC is designed to guarantee the global stability, while the MRAC is designed to provide a pre-established dynamic response to ensure a constant settling time to the PV voltage. Despite (Ortiz-Valencia et al, 2015) and (Ortiz-valencia et al, 2013) ensure constant settling times, such a time must be a static and pre-defined value, and therefore the P&O operation cannot be optimized depending on the operation conditions; in fact, the settling-time value is limited by the dynamic response of the converter in the worst case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ortiz‐Valencia et al investigate the improvement of maximum power tracking algorithm based on the combination of sliding mode current controller (SMCC) and a model reference adaptive controller (MRAC). The nonlinear SMCC is used to ensure the system stability; while the MRAC guarantees a constant PV voltage settling time for P&O MPPT algorithm.…”
Section: Related Work On Sliding Mode Mpptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the transfer function between the PV voltage and the duty cycle v pv d is calculated as in Equation (45). It is important to remark that R pv changes with the solar irradiance and temperature, hence the settling time t s of the PV voltage constantly changes [39]:…”
Section: Energies 2015 8 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to remark that changes with the solar irradiance and temperature, hence the settling time ts of the PV voltage constantly changes [39]:…”
Section: Energies 2015 8 23mentioning
confidence: 99%