2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1244-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deconvolution problem was extensively studied both in statistics and in signal processing; see Eggermont and LaRiccia (2001) and references therein. The deconvolution algorithm applied to the count data is summarized in the Appendix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deconvolution problem was extensively studied both in statistics and in signal processing; see Eggermont and LaRiccia (2001) and references therein. The deconvolution algorithm applied to the count data is summarized in the Appendix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, direct application of the above-defined algorithm generally shows that fewer and fewer smooth distributions are obtained as the iteration progresses. The standard solution then consists of stating the deconvolution problem as a maximum penalized likelihood estimation problem; see Eggermont and LaRiccia (2001) and references therein. It should be noted that the count data context is far more simple that the general deconvolution problem (also referred to as the contamination problem) since, in this case, the distribution of interest is a discrete distribution defined on a finite support and not a continuous distribution.…”
Section: Deconvolution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPLE approximates u as the maximizer of a log-likelihood term combined with a penalty term, typically enforcing smoothness [3],…”
Section: (A) Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical parametric methods [4] [10] [11] of density estimation assume that the data is coming from a known family of distributions, e.g. normal with mean µ and variance σ 2 , and try to estimate the parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%