1965
DOI: 10.6028/jres.069b.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum matching and a polyhedron with 0,1-vertices

Abstract: 1Jack Edmonds (Dece mbe r I , 1964) A matc hing in a graph C is a s ub set of e dges in C suc h that no two meet the sa me nod e in C. The co nvex polyhedron C is c harac te ri zed, wh e re th e e xtreme points of C co rres pond to th e matc hin gs in C. Wh e re eac h e dge of C car ri es a real num e ri cal we ight, a n e ffi c ie nt algorithm is describ ed for findin g a ma tc hin g in C with max imum we ight· s um .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
915
0
12

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,452 publications
(959 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
915
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The third one is a b-cut procedure based on blossom inequalities arising from Edmonds' description of matching-polytopes [5]. For this we just recall that the incidence vectors of u-capacitated b-matchings are the solutions of the following constraints:…”
Section: Linear Programming Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third one is a b-cut procedure based on blossom inequalities arising from Edmonds' description of matching-polytopes [5]. For this we just recall that the incidence vectors of u-capacitated b-matchings are the solutions of the following constraints:…”
Section: Linear Programming Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pk where the first inequality follows from the complete description of the perfect matching polytope due to Edmonds [8] and the first equality follows from the parsimonious property. Combining equations (9), (10) and (11) This corollary also generalizes the result on the worst-case analysis of the Steiner tree problem.…”
Section: Fork=l Top Domentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use minimum-weight perfect matching [22][23][24] to decode to physical errors, based on the pattern of detection events and an error model for the system. Intuitively, it connects detection events in pairs or to the boundary using the shortest weighted path length.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%