1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00220998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum-likelihood models for mapping genetic markers showing segregation distortion. 1. Backcross populations

Abstract: A maximum-likelihood approach is used in order to estimate recombination fractions between markers showing segregation distortion in backcross populations. It is assumed that the distortions are induced by viability differences between gametes or zygotes due to one or more selected genes. We show that Bailey's (1949) estimate stays consistent and efficient under more general assumptions than those defined by its author. This estimate should therefore be used instead of the classical maximum-likelihood estimate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
93
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Segregation distortion at the level introduced in this study had very little effect on marker order or length. For doubled-haploid populations, segregation distortion does not affect the equation for the maximum likelihood estimate of the recombination fraction when a single locus on a chromosome causes differential viability, although problems arise in the form of biased recombination fraction estimates when more than one locus is involved (Lorieux et al, 1995). Cheng et al (1998) have proposed a method for inferring the presence of and mapping a locus causing distortion, which they refer to as a partial lethal-factor locus, and have applied this to the barley Steptoe-Morex population.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Linkage Map Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segregation distortion at the level introduced in this study had very little effect on marker order or length. For doubled-haploid populations, segregation distortion does not affect the equation for the maximum likelihood estimate of the recombination fraction when a single locus on a chromosome causes differential viability, although problems arise in the form of biased recombination fraction estimates when more than one locus is involved (Lorieux et al, 1995). Cheng et al (1998) have proposed a method for inferring the presence of and mapping a locus causing distortion, which they refer to as a partial lethal-factor locus, and have applied this to the barley Steptoe-Morex population.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Linkage Map Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.0b, with threshold LOD values of 10.0 and a recombination fraction of 0.3. CentiMorgan (c) distances were calculated using the Kosambi function with corrections for segregation distortion using the program  (Lorieux et al, 1995). Linkage group numbers were assigned according to Cervera et al (2001).…”
Section: Mapping Of the Mxc3 And Mer Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the method that does not consider the effect of distorted markers, named method I, implemented by MapMaker v3.0 or JoinMap v4.0. The second is the method that considers the effect of distorted markers, named method II (Lorieux et al, 1995a, b;Zhu et al, 2007). The third is the new method described in this study, which considers the effect of epistatic distorted markers.…”
Section: Statistical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a similar approach, the statistical properties 2 and 3 can be obtained. Using method II, the recombinant fraction is estimated by ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi Lorieux et al, 1995a). In the fitness model, the estimate is changed tô…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%