2010 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/isabel.2010.5702817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum likelihood localization estimation based on received signal strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While LSE requires little prior training or estimation (other than the path loss exponent), as our results in this work demonstrate, it performs best under low fading variance. The high-performance, most sophisticated approach to pure RSS-based localization is maximum likelihood estimation [4]; however it requires an online, accurate, estimation of the fading variance and other channel parameters, and incurs a high algorithmic complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While LSE requires little prior training or estimation (other than the path loss exponent), as our results in this work demonstrate, it performs best under low fading variance. The high-performance, most sophisticated approach to pure RSS-based localization is maximum likelihood estimation [4]; however it requires an online, accurate, estimation of the fading variance and other channel parameters, and incurs a high algorithmic complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is desired to have good localization accuracy without any additional infrastructure cost. Numerous techniques such as fingerprinting [1] [2], least squares estimation [3], maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) [4], and sequence-based localization (SBL) [5] have been developed and deployed to achieve this goal. In all these techniques, Received Signal Strength (RSS) from the neighboring access points (beacons) is used to deduce the position of the receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed in the literature to tackle the problem of node localization by leveraging information extracted from existing terrestrial technologies [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Among others, range-based solutions have been widely employed in popular terrestrial localization systems, especially in WSNs, where they are preferred to range-free techniques [7,8] thanks to their reduced complexity. Range information can be obtained by exploiting different characteristics of the received signals, namely received signal strength (RSS) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], time (difference) of arrival (TOA/TDOA) [17][18][19][20], and angle of arrival (AOA) [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Range-based methods make use of the received signal in order to estimate the distance between the source and the receiving sensor node. The distance information can be extracted from different measurements of the received signal, like time of arrival, time difference of arrival and received signal strength, to name a few [16][17][18]. Nowadays, these different measurements are commonly integrated together, or combined with angle of arrival observations in order to enhance the localization accuracy [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%