2020
DOI: 10.1080/10168664.2020.1768812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Finite-Element Model Updating of Civil Engineering Structures Using Nature-Inspired Computational Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For acceleration-based EDMF, falsification thresholds were defined for natural frequencies and MAC values of the mode shapes for all four modes. Threshold values were defined iteratively, initially allowing natural frequencies to deviate ±5% relative to the experimental values, and the absolute MAC values being at least 0.90, following the recommendation by [53] of a 'good correlation' between the FE model and experiment. For strain-based EDMF, the initial falsification thresholds were set to ±5% relative to the experimental values in sensors SG_01, SG_02, SG_03, and SG_04.…”
Section: Femu Results: Residual Minimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For acceleration-based EDMF, falsification thresholds were defined for natural frequencies and MAC values of the mode shapes for all four modes. Threshold values were defined iteratively, initially allowing natural frequencies to deviate ±5% relative to the experimental values, and the absolute MAC values being at least 0.90, following the recommendation by [53] of a 'good correlation' between the FE model and experiment. For strain-based EDMF, the initial falsification thresholds were set to ±5% relative to the experimental values in sensors SG_01, SG_02, SG_03, and SG_04.…”
Section: Femu Results: Residual Minimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type returns a single value of each considered parameter and the second type returns an interval of possible values of each considered parameter. The maximum likelihood method, a point estimator, has been considered herein to perform this problem due to its efficiency and accuracy in the solution of the updating problem (Jiménez-Alonso et al, 2017).…”
Section: Parameter Identification Methods Of Dynamic Systems Using a Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Naranjo-Perez et al (2020) proposed a hybrid UKF–harmony search (HS) algorithm for the FE model updating of complex civil engineering structures. This hybrid algorithm combined the virtues of two individual algorithms as follows: (1) the (local) UKF algorithm, which reduces the uncertainty associated with the parameter identification based on experimental data; and (2) the (global) HS algorithm (Geem et al, 2001), which reduces significantly simulation times when compared to other classical metaheuristic algorithms (Jiménez-Alonso et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible classification is to divide iterative methods into deterministic and stochastic methods [21]. The iterative deterministic maximum likelihood method transforms the model updating problem into an optimization problem, and the objective function is defined in terms of residuals between different types of numerically and experimentally obtained data sets; most often, natural frequencies and mode shapes are used [22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%