2017
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1269606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Structural Equation Models for Continuous Data: Standard Errors and Goodness of Fit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
151
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
151
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Because we oversampled children with high SDQ scores, data were weighted according to the number of children in the stratum in the population divided by the number of participating children in that specific stratum. A robust maximum likelihood estimator was used, 42 which did not presuppose multivariate normality. To assess the prospective associations between sleep duration and symptoms of psychiatric disorders, we applied fixed and hybrid dynamic panel modeling (eFigure, eEquation, eAppendix 1, and eAppendix 2 in the Supplement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Because we oversampled children with high SDQ scores, data were weighted according to the number of children in the stratum in the population divided by the number of participating children in that specific stratum. A robust maximum likelihood estimator was used, 42 which did not presuppose multivariate normality. To assess the prospective associations between sleep duration and symptoms of psychiatric disorders, we applied fixed and hybrid dynamic panel modeling (eFigure, eEquation, eAppendix 1, and eAppendix 2 in the Supplement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of an SEM model has been indicated by different indices, including the number of observed variables (p), the number of parameters to be estimated (q), the degrees of freedom (df = p (p + 1)/2 2q), and the ratio of the observed variables to latent factors (p/f). Recent studies have suggested that the number of observed variables (p) is the most important determinant of model size effects (Moshagen, 2012;Shi, Lee, et al, 2015, 2017. Therefore, in the current study, we define large models as SEM models with many observed indicators.…”
Section: Authors' Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated models tested the effects of cyberbullying roles (i.e., Cyberbully, Cyber-victim, and Cyberbully-victim), coded as dummy variables (0 = No, 1 = Yes), on depressive and anxiety symptoms, and subjective well-being through the potential mediation effect of perceived family, friends, and teachers support, controlling for age and gender. The mean-and variance-adjusted maximum likelihood test statistic (MLMV) was used as the estimator, since it is robust to non-normal data, and yields the best combination of accurate standard errors and Type I error [49]. Goodness-of-fit was assessed using the root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI), and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%