1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2858-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Functional Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To explore whether gender, age and severity of injury would improve the models, these variables were added in the regression, but, as they did not have a positive effect, the original model was chosen to decrease the number of variables in the model. For the degree of variance explained in the logistic regression the Cox & Snell (17) and Nagelkerke (18) were used, and reported as an interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore whether gender, age and severity of injury would improve the models, these variables were added in the regression, but, as they did not have a positive effect, the original model was chosen to decrease the number of variables in the model. For the degree of variance explained in the logistic regression the Cox & Snell (17) and Nagelkerke (18) were used, and reported as an interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this high detectability, we report the results of traditional logistic models, but results were identical in PRESENCE. Model fit was evaluated using Nagelkerke's maxrescaled R 2 (R 2 N ), which provides a measure of the proportion of variance explained through logistic regression (Nagelkerke 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cox and Snell's R 2 has a lower value due to its definition. As Nagelkerke (1992) points out that the main disadvantage of using Cox and Snell's R 2 to measure the model fit of a logistic regression is that the value can never achieve its maximum value of 1. Nagelkerke's R 2 was then developed as a modification of Cox and Snell's R 2 .…”
Section: Logit Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%