1999
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1822:mleofa>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Forecast and Observation Error Covariance Parameters. Part I: Methodology

Abstract: The maximum-likelihood method for estimating observation and forecast error covariance parameters is described. The method is presented in general terms but with particular emphasis on practical aspects of implementation. Issues such as bias estimation and correction, parameter identi ability, estimation accuracy, and robustness of the method, are discussed in detail. The relationship between the maximum-likelihood method and Generalized Cross-Validation is brie y addressed. The method can be regarded as a gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
117
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a discussion of covariance estimation techniques in the context of NWP, (see, e.g. [28,41,15,16]). Fortunately, the simulation results of Section 6 illustrate that the improvement in MSE due to tapering is robust to the choice of taper function and of taper length.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a discussion of covariance estimation techniques in the context of NWP, (see, e.g. [28,41,15,16]). Fortunately, the simulation results of Section 6 illustrate that the improvement in MSE due to tapering is robust to the choice of taper function and of taper length.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the expectation of the last term in the previous equation all the terms not involving 1/n 2 cancel. Combining (39) and (40) gives the third order approximation given in (14) and (15).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This empirical algorithm has been adapted to retrieve AOT directly from cloud-cleared MODIS reflectances. Online quality control is performed with the adaptive buddy check of Dee et al (2001), with observation and background errors estimated using the maximum likelihood approach of Dee and da Silva (1999). Following a multi-channel AOT analysis, three-dimensional analysis increments are produced exploring the Lagrangian characteristics of the problem, generating local displacement ensembles intended to represent misplacements of the aerosol plumes.…”
Section: A14 Nasa Geos-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Too small or too large an inflation factor will cause the analysis state to over rely on the model forecasts or observations and can seriously undermine the accuracy and stability of the filter. In later studies, the inflation factor is estimated online based on the observation-minus-forecast residual (innovation statistic) [16,17] with different conditions. Past work shows that moment estimation can facilitate the calculation by solving an equation of the observation-minus-forecast residual and its realization [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%