2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum likelihood estimation of DOD and DOA for bistatic MIMO radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer simulations are carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm by comparing with the 2-D ESPRIT [11], ESPRIT [12], Chen et al's [13] algorithms, reduced-dimension (RD)-MUSIC approach [21], as well as ML algorithm [14] for joint DOD and DOA estimation in bistatic MIMO radar. Furthermore, the results of the MUSIC approach [17] initialized by [11][12][13], are included, while the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) is employed as the performance benchmark [12].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Computer simulations are carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm by comparing with the 2-D ESPRIT [11], ESPRIT [12], Chen et al's [13] algorithms, reduced-dimension (RD)-MUSIC approach [21], as well as ML algorithm [14] for joint DOD and DOA estimation in bistatic MIMO radar. Furthermore, the results of the MUSIC approach [17] initialized by [11][12][13], are included, while the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) is employed as the performance benchmark [12].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters are the same as before except that K = 8 and the additional {θ k } and {φ k } are shown in [11][12][13] are 20 dB while that of the proposed algorithm is 10 dB. The ML algorithm [14] performs unsatisfactorily because of poor initialization while the algorithm in [21] is even worse as it cannot resolve K pairs of DODs/DOAs for SNR < 30 dB. The superiority of our proposal in terms of estimation performance over the other algorithms is demonstrated in this more challenging environment.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The direction of arrival (DOA) estimation algorithms in collocated MIMO radar have attracted a lot of attention and have been investigated by many researchers. In order to achieve the effective estimated parameters, traditional high-resolution direction finding (DF) algorithms, such as the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate, multiple signal classification (MUSIC) estimate, estimation of signal parameters by rotational invariance techniques (ESPRIT) and so on, have been widely used in the target' parameter estimation of MIMO radar [5]- [8] and have reached superior performance compared with the conventional methods. In these DF algorithms, Conventional ML, Capon and MUSIC algorithms have been used for angle estimation regardless of the array manifold in MIMO radar, but they need spatial spectrum peak searching with high computation cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%