2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum likelihood autoregressive model parameter estimation with noise corrupted independent snapshots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…used the maximum likelihood principle to reconstruct the parameters of Bernoulli autoregressive systems [ 22 ]. Çayır and Candan developed a parameter estimation approach for autoregressive models through using the maximum likelihood principle [ 23 ]. By using the maximum likelihood principle, this paper derived the maximum likelihood fitness and proposes two novel algorithms to estimate the moisture ratio model of a cantaloupe drying process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used the maximum likelihood principle to reconstruct the parameters of Bernoulli autoregressive systems [ 22 ]. Çayır and Candan developed a parameter estimation approach for autoregressive models through using the maximum likelihood principle [ 23 ]. By using the maximum likelihood principle, this paper derived the maximum likelihood fitness and proposes two novel algorithms to estimate the moisture ratio model of a cantaloupe drying process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-step localization method [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] processes the observed signals in the central processor without parameter extraction and then constructs the cost function only related to the position of the emitter. This kind of localization algorithms finally obtain the position of the emitter through the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), the least squares, the grid search, gradient-based methods, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, Weiss first proposed direct position determination technology [21], analyzed, and compared the DPD performance with AOA for signals with known (DPD-known) and unknown waveforms (DPD-unknown) [22,23]. Over the past dozen years, multiple DPD algorithms have been presented to enhance performance of passive localization system based on different approaches including the maximum likelihood (ML) [25,26], the time frequency analysis (DPD-STFT-w) [27], the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [28,29], the expectation maximization (EM-DPD) [30,31], the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) [32][33][34], and the time-varying delay [35]. Compared with the one-step approaches, the DPD algorithms directly estimate the initial position of the target according to the received signals in the central station, avoiding the process of correlation of parameters of different receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%