Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have the capability to cover long foraging distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
482
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 622 publications
(515 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
482
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It has recently been shown that a significant increase in net species diversification rate coincided with the origin of Malpighiaceae and their pollinator mutualism (21). One possibility is that speciation in New World Malpighiaceae is explained by the small geographic range of most solitary bee pollinators and territoriality in male oil bees (50)(51)(52)(53), combined with the wide geographic ranges of numerous Malpighiaceae clades (30), which together could facilitate allopatric speciation within the group. Diversification rates in plant clades with zygomorphic flowers like Malpighiaceace have been shown to be significantly increased (19,54); this has been cited as an example of species selection (20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has recently been shown that a significant increase in net species diversification rate coincided with the origin of Malpighiaceae and their pollinator mutualism (21). One possibility is that speciation in New World Malpighiaceae is explained by the small geographic range of most solitary bee pollinators and territoriality in male oil bees (50)(51)(52)(53), combined with the wide geographic ranges of numerous Malpighiaceae clades (30), which together could facilitate allopatric speciation within the group. Diversification rates in plant clades with zygomorphic flowers like Malpighiaceace have been shown to be significantly increased (19,54); this has been cited as an example of species selection (20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is most likely that high frequency of mating between closely related individuals occurs in certain landscapes, as observed for other Neotropical tree species pollinated by animals (e.g., Caryocar brasiliense; Collevatti et al, 2001). Moreover, E. edulis is pollinated mainly by small-sized bees, which present relatively short flight distance (o840 m; Zurbuchen et al, 2010). Flight distance in small bees can be reduced by habitat fragmentation and isolation, even at short isolation distances (Zurbuchen et al, 2010), increasing inbreeding within fragments.…”
Section: Genetic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each landscape was defined by a circle of 2 km radius around a midpoint among the sites where E. edulis were sampled ( Figure 1b). We chose this radius because foraging distance of potential pollinators, such as Plebleia droryana and Trigona spinipis, can reach 540 and 840 m, respectively (Zurbuchen et al, 2010) and seed dispersal distances by large bird species taxonomically related with the dispersers of E. edulis are likely to be shorter than 600 m (Holbrook, 2011). Using this experimental design, we were able to assess the effects of landscape structure and geographic distance between sites on genetic variability and genetic differentiation among sites within landscapes.…”
Section: Landscapes and Sites Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As opposed to most parasitoids, many host species are strong flyers. Albeit having a preference for short foraging distances, those species might cover large areas [53] considerably exceeding the size of the plots on which the environmental variables were measured. Thus, it might be that in our study system hosts are less related to local tree MPD than parasitoids but more dependent on habitat properties affecting their nesting.…”
Section: (B) Direct and Indirect Environmental Influences On Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%