2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum delay bounds of linear systems under delay independent truncated predictor feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1 establishes an estimated maximum delay bound of low-gain type in the sense that the low-gain feedback parameter is sufficiently small rather than on the half axis of > 0, no matter how small the value of the delay bound D is. This is the main difference from the delay-independent truncated predictor state feedback results in our previous work, 20 which states that, for any a priori selected value of , the state feedback law would asymptotically stabilize the system as long as the delay bound is sufficiently small. Such a different scenario arises because of our delay-independent state observer design, in which the dynamic of the estimated state depends on the current input signal u(t) rather than u( (t)).…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1 establishes an estimated maximum delay bound of low-gain type in the sense that the low-gain feedback parameter is sufficiently small rather than on the half axis of > 0, no matter how small the value of the delay bound D is. This is the main difference from the delay-independent truncated predictor state feedback results in our previous work, 20 which states that, for any a priori selected value of , the state feedback law would asymptotically stabilize the system as long as the delay bound is sufficiently small. Such a different scenario arises because of our delay-independent state observer design, in which the dynamic of the estimated state depends on the current input signal u(t) rather than u( (t)).…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In what follows, we consider a given ∈ (−2min{Re( (A + ))}, * ]. In light of (20), it follows from (17) that if ≥ 1 ,…”
Section: Delay-independent Output Feedback Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P k ∈ (q+m)×(q+m) is a symmetric positive-definite covariance matrix, α k is a positive coefficient and β k > 0 is a scalar coefficient used to prevent a singularˆ k . The coefficient γ k is defined similar to (18) and is given as…”
Section: Extension To Multivariable Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a state‐feedback control law, where the gains are computed using a Lyapunov equation‐based method. However, if the plant is unstable, the amount of delay that the method can handle is limited [10]. In the case of output feedback, predictor‐based rejection control is an interesting solution [11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%