Back injuries to the lifters caused by lifting remain a common occurrence not only in developed countries, but also in developing and undeveloped countries. Asymmetric lifting task, combining lifting, bending and twisting motions of the torso, is more harmful to back spine than symmetric lifting task. Snook and Irvin 1) first developed the psychophysical approach to determine human maximum acceptable weight of lifting (MAWL) for preventing lifters from sustaining back injuries, and this approach has been adopted in various lifting conditions. Ciriello et al.2) indicated that the psychophysically determined MAWL data could be applied to a general work day for task frequencies of 4.3 lifts/min or lower.Very few papers reported the container effects on psychophysically determined MAWL, especially for asymmetric lifting. This study examined the effects of lifting frequency and container on psychophysically determined 4-h MAWL for 90-degree asymmetric lifting tasks from floor to knuckle height (approximately 74 cm). Additionally, this study compared the MAWL data with the recommended weight limits derived from the revised NIOSH lifting equation 3) . It is hoped that these MAWL data can help designing asymmetric lifting jobs for reducing the severity and frequency of overexertion injuries and improving productivity.Ten young healthy and lift-experienced males gave their written consent form for this experiment. Their mean (SD) age was 20.0 (0.5) yr, weight was 62.7 (8.0) kg, and height was 170.0 (4.3) cm.A two-factor factorial design was used to examine the effects of lifting frequency and container on participants' MAWL capability in asymmetrical lifting tasks. Three lifting frequencies, 1 lift/min, 2 lifts/min and 4 lifts/min, and three containers (length*width*height), 70 × 35 × 15 cm, 50 × 50 × 15 cm and 50 × 35 × 15 cm were selected. The three containers were designed for examining the effects of