2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(03)00010-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
20
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonsignificant interaction effect of frequency and container on MAWL simplifies the data explanation. 7,8) studies, while was higher than the 7% decrement reported in Mital and Fard 9) study. The reason for the decrement with lifting frequency may be primarily due to increased handling of the body weight 10) .…”
contrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The nonsignificant interaction effect of frequency and container on MAWL simplifies the data explanation. 7,8) studies, while was higher than the 7% decrement reported in Mital and Fard 9) study. The reason for the decrement with lifting frequency may be primarily due to increased handling of the body weight 10) .…”
contrasting
confidence: 50%
“…In this low lifting frequency (1 lift min À1 ) condition, the biomechanical restriction is more dominant than physiological limitation. Recently, Wu (2003) studied on Chinese female college students and reported that MAWL for Chinese females for 1 h lifting from floor to the knuckle height level obtained as 24.80 kg with an overall average RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) response was ''somewhat hard''. In India, existing Maharashtra Factory Rule suggested that 30 kg load should be the acceptable load limit for Indian Female workers (Dwivedi, 2000), which is just double of this estimated MAWL value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the study by Morshedi et al showed that by increasing the trunk forward bending to lift loads from the bottom floors, the compressive force exerted on L5/S1 significantly increased compared to that of the upper floors (22). The results of the study by Wu on Chinese females indicated that increasing the trunk angle reduced maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) (23). Several studies suggested that the impact of awkward postures was greater than that of the external load weight in increasing the compressive force (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%