2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum acceptable infusion rate of citrate: Relationship between blood ionized calcium levels and cardiovascular effects in anesthetized rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ionized calcium levels required for hemodynamic stability were kept within the physiological range [19, 20] by infusion of 10% calcium gluconate at fixed rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionized calcium levels required for hemodynamic stability were kept within the physiological range [19, 20] by infusion of 10% calcium gluconate at fixed rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…after apheresis. Toyoshima et al (2006) explained hypotension following infusion of citrate at a rate >1.0 mmol/kg/h by hypocalcemia which is more severe with increased infusion rate of citrate. Tachycardia also reported in such cases and is believed to be a reflex for hypotension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During apheresis, the decrease in the level of calcium ions may cause prolongation of the plateau phase of myocardial depolarization, and this occasionally displays itself as prolongation of the QTc interval on electrocardiogram (Hester et al , 1983; Meikle & Milne, 2000; Laspina et al , 2002; Raj et al , 2005). In case of prolongation of QTc, plasma calcium values (a marker of citrate toxicity at the myocardial level) should be analysed (Roberts et al , 1984; Toyoshima et al , 2006). Furthermore, a decreased level of magnesium in plasma (total or ionized) can also exert a significant effect on QTc interval duration (Bolan et al , 2004; Meenagh et al , 2004; Haddad et al , 2005; Hoshino et al , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%