2004
DOI: 10.1109/tsa.2003.819950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum A-Posteriori Probability Pitch Tracking in Noisy Environments Using Harmonic Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results in [15] demonstrate the robustness and the accuracy of LMS method relative to standard algorithms such as RAPT [16] and the maximum a posterior estimator (MAP) of [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results in [15] demonstrate the robustness and the accuracy of LMS method relative to standard algorithms such as RAPT [16] and the maximum a posterior estimator (MAP) of [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, including prior information on how the fundamental frequency evolves from frame to frame enabled a maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator capable of tracking fundamental frequencies through a dynamic programming implementation (Tabrikian et al, 2004). While some methods of fundamental frequency estimation implicitly provide voicing classification, other methods have been developed explicitly for voicing classification (Dhananjaya and Yegnanarayana, 2013;Harding and Milner, 2012).…”
Section: Yin Takes Peaks Of the Squared Difference Function As Fundammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it is preferable to use methods that approximate the recursive Bayesian filtering equations directly. These approaches include maximum a posteriori filters [11], particle filters [12,13], and point mass filters (PMFs) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%