2012
DOI: 10.1126/science.337.6096.799-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing Endangered Species Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommendations to conduct experimental removal of barred owls have been criticized as being too difficult to accomplish because of the effort and cost required to maintain sufficiently low numbers of barred owls to benefit northern spotted owls (Livezey , Rosenberg et al ). Nonetheless, pilot studies in coastal California have demonstrated a positive association between removal of barred owls and population trends of northern spotted owls (Diller et al , Dugger et al ); Diller et al () reported that removal of barred owls can be rapid, technically feasible, and cost‐effective.…”
Section: Priorities For Research and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recommendations to conduct experimental removal of barred owls have been criticized as being too difficult to accomplish because of the effort and cost required to maintain sufficiently low numbers of barred owls to benefit northern spotted owls (Livezey , Rosenberg et al ). Nonetheless, pilot studies in coastal California have demonstrated a positive association between removal of barred owls and population trends of northern spotted owls (Diller et al , Dugger et al ); Diller et al () reported that removal of barred owls can be rapid, technically feasible, and cost‐effective.…”
Section: Priorities For Research and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Pacific Northwest, complete eradication of barred owls is unlikely because of their abundance and colonization and dispersal abilities (Rosenberg et al ; Yackulic et al , ). However, removal over large scales may affect regional occupancy rates and lead to reduced barred owl recolonization (Yackulic et al ).…”
Section: Priorities For Research and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, removal experiments have been recommended in the northern spotted owl recovery plan (USFWS , ) because they provide a causal test of the relationship between declining trends in northern spotted owl populations and increasing trends of barred owls. Despite scientific support for such experiments (Romesburg ), they are controversial based on assertions that removal experiments would be costly, difficult to accomplish, and would require continuous maintenance to address re‐colonization of removal sites by barred owls (Livezey , Rosenberg et al ). These are reasonable concerns because efficacy of any potential removal experiment, and ultimately, a barred owl management strategy, must be feasible and not result in the death of unintended species (Caughley and Gunn ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish and Wildlife Service to recognize the barred owl as a primary threat to the northern spotted owl, and recommend removal experiments to test the hypothesis that barred owls were causing the observed decline of northern spotted owl and to examine the feasibility of controlling barred owls (USFWS ). The recommendation to conduct experiments has been criticized by some as being, among other things, precedent‐setting, costly, ineffective, and distracting to scientists (Livezey , Rosenberg et al ). To address cost and feasibility concerns, we removed barred owls on a portion of Green Diamond Resource Company's (hereafter, Green Diamond) long‐term northern spotted owl demographic area where barred owls have been increasing and spotted owls have been decreasing in recent years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%