1965
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700020023x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximization of Potato Yield Under Constraint1

Abstract: Synopsis Optimum response is occasionally sought while maintaining a minimum quality factor level. Mathematical analysis may need to be confined within the range of factor levels observed. An example of such an applied problem is worked. It involves searching for the nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizer treatment which will produce the maximum potato yield and yet not cause the specific gravity of the potato tubers to fall below a minimum value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with Schippers (1968), who mentioned that increasing N rates reduced tuber quality due to an increase of tuber water content. However, other researchers (Hermanson, 1965; Kelling & Speth, 2004; Kelling, Stevenson, Speth, & James, 2016) did not observe any effect of N rates on specific gravity, starch content, and dry matter (Teich & Menzies, 1964; Zebarth et al., 2004). In some situations, specific gravity, starch, and dry matter content levels may increase compared to the zero N rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These results are in line with Schippers (1968), who mentioned that increasing N rates reduced tuber quality due to an increase of tuber water content. However, other researchers (Hermanson, 1965; Kelling & Speth, 2004; Kelling, Stevenson, Speth, & James, 2016) did not observe any effect of N rates on specific gravity, starch content, and dry matter (Teich & Menzies, 1964; Zebarth et al., 2004). In some situations, specific gravity, starch, and dry matter content levels may increase compared to the zero N rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%