1996
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-96-01665-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal subgroups in finite and profinite groups

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that if a finitely generated profinite group G is not generated with positive probability by finitely many random elements, then every finite group F is obtained as a quotient of an open subgroup of G. The proof involves the study of maximal subgroups of profinite groups, as well as techniques from finite permutation groups and finite Chevalley groups. Confirming a conjecture from Ann. of Math. 137 (1993), 203-220, we then prove that a finite group G has at most |G| c maximal soluble subgrou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the most revealing is (3). The equivalence PFG ⇔ (4) extends the main result of [8] which states that finitely generated non-PFG groups have arbitrarily large alternating sections. The equivalence PFG ⇔ (7) also follows from Theorem 1.…”
Section: Characterization Of Positively Finitely Generated Profinite supporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps the most revealing is (3). The equivalence PFG ⇔ (4) extends the main result of [8] which states that finitely generated non-PFG groups have arbitrarily large alternating sections. The equivalence PFG ⇔ (7) also follows from Theorem 1.…”
Section: Characterization Of Positively Finitely Generated Profinite supporting
confidence: 61%
“…For primitive soluble groups it is an immediate consequence of [47,Lemma 3.4]. More generally in [8] it was shown to hold for groups G with no large alternating sections (in which case the primitive groups have polynomial size [5]). Moreover by a central result of [38], it was known to hold for primitive groups with a given abstract isomorphism type.…”
Section: Theorem 3 ([38])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[57] page 67. 14 Cfr. theorem 3.5.1 page 60 and corollary 3.5.2. page 62 in [53], the more general case only requires the condition p > 2.…”
Section: Loops and Local Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%