2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-015-1199-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal regularity for non-autonomous evolution equations

Abstract: We consider the maximal regularity problem for non-autonomous evolution equationsEach operator A(t) is associated with a sesquilinear form a(t; ·, ·) on a Hilbert space H. We assume that these forms all have the same domain and satisfy some regularity assumption with respect to t (e.g., piecewise α-Hölder continuous for some α > 1 /2). We prove maximal Lpregularity for all u 0 in the real-interpolation space (H, D(A(0))) 1−1/p,p . The particular case where p = 2 improves previously known results and gives a po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For q = 1 this is the condition used by Ouhabaz and Haak [5]. We also see that any of the conditions above is implied by α-Hölder continuity for an α > 1 2 .…”
Section: Comparison To Earlier Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For q = 1 this is the condition used by Ouhabaz and Haak [5]. We also see that any of the conditions above is implied by α-Hölder continuity for an α > 1 2 .…”
Section: Comparison To Earlier Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Step 2: We show that t0tA(t)e(ts)A(t)f(s)dsL2(0,T;H). The proof here is much more elementary than the one of [, Lemma 2.5] thanks to our stronger condition on the form fraktura. By A (0) satisfies maximal regularity and t0tA(0)e(ts)A(0)f(s)dsL2(0,T;H).Thus it suffices to show that ϕ:t0tA(t)e(ts)A(t)f(s)ds0tA(0)e(ts)A(0)f(s)dsL2(0,T;H).As before we have ϕ(t)=0t12πiΓλe(ts)λ(λ Id A(t))1(scriptA(t)scriptA(0))(λ Id A(0))1f(s)dλds....…”
Section: Maximal Regularity In Hmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For that we use the decomposition and show that A(·)uj(·)L2(0,T;H) for j=1,2,3 where u1(t)=etA(t)u0,u2(t)=0te(ts)A(t)f(s)ds,andu3(t)=0te(ts)A(t)scriptA(t)scriptA(s)u(s)ds. Remark that implies for all t,s[0,T] A(t)A(s)L(V,Vγ)1emand1emscriptA(t)A(s)L(V,Vγ)c0.16emω(|ts|).We divide the proof into three steps to treat each uj, j=1,2,3 separately. Step 1: We adapt the proof of [, Lemma 2.7] to our situation. Since …”
Section: Maximal Regularity In Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the domains of the operators A(t) do not depend on time, we mention [42], [3], [5], and in the case of time-depending domains, we refer to [30], [31], [40], [6] and [27].…”
Section: Maximal Regularity Of Abstract Cauchy Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%