Lattice-free sets (convex subsets of R d without interior integer points) and their applications for cutting-plane methods in mixed-integer optimization have been studied in recent literature. Notably, the family of all integral lattice-free polyhedra which are not properly contained in another integral lattice-free polyhedron has been of particular interest. We call these polyhedraIt is known that, for fixed d, the family Z d -maximal integral lattice-free polyhedra is finite up to unimodular equivalence. In view of possible applications in cuttingplane theory, one would like to have a classification of this family. However, this turns out to be a challenging task already for small dimensions.In contrast, the subfamily of all integral lattice-free polyhedra which are not properly contained in any other lattice-free set, which we call R d -maximal latticefree polyhedra, allow a rather simple geometric characterization. Hence, the question was raised for which dimensions the notions of Z d -maximality and R d -maximality are equivalent. This was known to be the case for dimensions one and two. On the other hand, Nill and Ziegler (2011) showed that for dimension d ≥ 4, there exist polyhedra which are Z d -maximal but not R d -maximal. In this article, we consider the remaining case d = 3 and prove that for integral polyhedra the notions of R 3 -maximality and Z 3 -maximality are equivalent. As a consequence, the classification of all R 3 -maximal integral polyhedra by Averkov, Wagner and Weismantel (2011) contains all Z 3 -maximal integral polyhedra.