Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists’ and technologists’ attitudes and opinions

Hatamleh, Muhanad M.; Haylock, Colin; Watson, Jason; Watts, David C.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.08.002

Cited by 70 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 22 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hatamleh et al [12] reported that, ocular prostheses included in their study were entirely retained by undercuts. Chemical retention was advised especially for orbital and nasal prostheses [12]. Contrarily, they are not advised for large midfacial defects because the skin adhesives might be precluded due to the presence of persistent moisture and saliva [14].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Facial prostheses retaining to anatomical and/or surgical undercuts; also retaining with mechanical aids have been still reported [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11]. Hatamleh et al [12] reported that, ocular prostheses included in their study were entirely retained by undercuts. Chemical retention was advised especially for orbital and nasal prostheses [12].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…They were mostly auricular prostheses. Orbital and nasal prostheses followed consequently [12,16,17]. Insertion of the implants and the insertion of the percutaneous abutments were performed in two separate interventions in this case and the implant locations were planned virtually prior to the first stage.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Mechanical retention obtained by eyeglasses, straps or headbands, has been used for a long time [9][10][11]. Skin adhesives have also been used for chemical retention in spite of their limitations [12][13][14]. Surgical retention provided by surgically created retention elements such as skinpenetrating osseointegrated implants, has been used since 1977 and are the most favorable retention sources for facial prostheses nowadays [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Bone and Skin-Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Cranio-Facial Implant Placement

Çötert

Yılmaz

2015

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Osseointegrated skin-penetrating implants enhance the retention and stability of the craniofacial prostheses and provide the long-term comfort. However, to determine the implant locations is a great challenge facing the surgeon. Implants may either be located in conventional manner or by STL generated surgical guides. Materials and Methods Present study reports the CT based 3D virtual modeling, preoperative virtual planning and the implant placement by using a STL surgical guide, in an anotia case. Results Employed materials and the methods facilitated the implant surgery while improving the operational security. Conclusions CT based 3D virtual modeling of the surgical site, determining the implant locations virtually and the STL guided placement of the craniofacial implants, were found useful applications in order to facilitating the surgical intervention and providing prevention from complications.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bone and Skin-Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Cranio-Facial Implant Placement

Çötert

Yılmaz

2015

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They advise necessary radiographic investigations of the jaws to figure out several existing dental and bone related issues that could be treated beforehand so that unwanted complications can be avoided later [6]. Pre-proshetic surgery is very well planned and can be carryout to remove anatomic interferences and achieve healthy oral hard and soft tissue to receive future prosthesis [7]. The strategy and techniques of prosthetic phase depends on the site of involvement, its extent and type of surgical intervention, and use of modalities such as radiation and /or chemotherapy [8].…”

Section: Role and Responsibility Of Mfp'smentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral cancer rehabilitation: Requirement and responsibility of maxillofacial prosthodontist’s (MFP’s)

Dugad¹,

Athavale²,

Chouksey³

et al. 2017

Surg Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: A patient with oral cancer receives prosthesis, which can help them achieve optimum esthetic, function and form through total oral rehabilitation. Maxillofacial Prosthodontists (MFPs) plays an important role in the management of head and neck cancer patients from the preliminary stage of treatment planning. However, their role is often less understood. The objective of the article is to provide a brief insight into the requirement and role of MFP's in management of patients with head and neck cancer.Discussion: There is not a more severely handicapped person than a patient with gross facial disfigurement. Since the most exposed portion of his body is unkindly distorted, he / she often undergo callous indignities and social trauma because of this abnormality. Implication for practice:Taking into account, the prevalence of functional and cosmetic deficits, there is a need for patient-centric approach for addressing every aspect of their problems.

show abstract

Polydimethyl Siloxane Elastomers in Maxillofacial Prosthetic Use

Çötert

2014

Concise Encyclopedia of High Performance Silicones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists’ and technologists’ attitudes and opinions

Cited by 70 publications

References 22 publications

Bone and Skin-Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Cranio-Facial Implant Placement

Bone and Skin-Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Cranio-Facial Implant Placement

Oral cancer rehabilitation: Requirement and responsibility of maxillofacial prosthodontist’s (MFP’s)

Polydimethyl Siloxane Elastomers in Maxillofacial Prosthetic Use

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About