Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines

Oz, Aslihan Zeynep; Öz, Abdullah Alper; El, Hakan; Palomo, Juan Martín

doi:10.2319/122915-895.1

Cited by 27 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These volumes are compatible with those in previous studies (12,14,15), although there were variations owing to gender, age, and characteristics of the dentition and ethical group. However, the methodology for measuring the maxillary sinus may influence considerably the volume; the internal anatomy of maxillary sinuses is very complex and irregular, with presence of septs and other anatomical variations.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Surgeons’ Performance Determining the Amount of Graft Material for Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Tomography

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to assess the performance of surgeons in determining the amount of graft material required for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in a preoperative analysis using cone-beam computed tomography images. A convenience sample of 10 retrospective CBCT exams (i-CAT®) was selected. Scans of the posterior maxilla area with an absence of at least one tooth and residual alveolar bone with an up to 5 mm height were used. Templates (n=20) contained images of representative cross-sections in multiplanar view. Ten expert surgeons voluntarily participated as appraisers of the templates for grafting surgical planning of a 10 mm long implant. Appraisers could choose a better amount of graft material using scores: 0) when considered grafting unnecessary, 1) for 0.25 g in graft material, 2) for 0.50 g, 3) for 1.00 g and 4) for 1.50 g or more. Reliability of the response pattern was analyzed using Cronbach's α. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to compare scores. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether the volume of sinuses (mm 3 ) influenced the choose of scores. In the reliability analysis, all values were low and the score distribution was independent of the volume of the maxillary sinuses (p>0.05), which did not influence choosing the amount of graft material. Surgeons were unreliable to determine the best amount of graft material for the maxillary sinus floor augmentation using only CBCT images. Surgeons require auxiliary diagnostic tools to measure the volume associated to CBCT exams in order to perform better.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Surgeons’ Performance Determining the Amount of Graft Material for Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Tomography

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In extraction cases moving teeth through sinus area is important factor for new bone apposition [31,32]. Oz et al [33] also found that maxillary sinus volume was affected by impacted teeth and another pathologic situation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Changes in Growing Subjects: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to evaluate changes of maxillary sinuses in growing subjects. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of 146 patients were divided according to gender and age (6–8, 9–11, 12–14 years old). Left, right and total maxillary sinus volume (MSV-R, MSV-L, MSV-Tot) and surface (MSS-R, MSS-L, MSS-Tot), left and right linear maximum width (LMW-L, LMW-R), depth (LMD-R, LMD-L) and height (LMH-R, LMH-R) were calculated using Mimics Research 22. Kruskal–Wallis Test and showed a statistically significant increase in both genders for all variables. Pairwise comparisons in females are always statistically significant in: LMH-R, LMH-R, MSS-Tot, MSV-Tot. All other variables showed a statistical significant increase between 9–11 and 12–14, and between 6–8 and 12–14 age groups, apart from LMSW-R, LMSW-L, LMSD-R, LMSD-L between 6–8 and 12–14 age groups. Pairwise comparisons in males are always and only statistically significant between 9–11 and 12–14, and between 6–8 and 12–14 groups. Symmetrical measurements (right and left) evaluated using Wilcoxon test retrieved no statistical significant difference. Comparisons between measurements on male and female subjects using Mann–Whitney test showed a statistical significant difference in 6–8 years group in MSV-R, MSV-L and MSV-Tot, and in 12–14 age group in MSV-R, MSV-L, MSV-Tot, MSS-r, MSS-l, MSS-Tot, MSW-R, MSW-L, MSD-R, MSD-L. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) assessing inter-operator and intra-operator concordance retrieved excellent results for all variables. It appears that maxillary sinus growth resembles the differential peak of growth in male and female subjects. Sinuses starts to develop early in female subjects. However, in the first and last age group female sinuses are statistically significantly smaller compared to male ones. In male subjects, sinus growth occurs mainly between the second and third age group whilst in female subjects it starts between the first and second age group and continues between the second and the last. Sinus has a vertical development during the peak of growth, which is the main reason for its increase in volume.

show abstract

“…To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first study to utilize this technique to measure maxillary sinus graft volume in the context of dental implants. It is however a utilized technique reported in the orthodontic literature to measure airway volume and maxillary sinus volume (Darsey, English, Kau, Ellis & Akyalcin, ; Oz, Oz, El & Palomo, ; Pangrazio‐Kulbersh, Wine, Haughey, Pajtas & Kaczynski, ). By measuring the volumetric change in the air‐filled maxillary sinus cavity, it overcomes a major disadvantage of traditional techniques such as manual perimeter tracing of a region of interest (Johansson, Grepe, Wannfors, Aberg, et al., ; Johansson, Grepe, Wannfors, & Hirsch, ; Uchida, Goto, Katsuki & Akiyoshi, ; Uchida, Goto, Katsuki & Soejima, ; Wanschitz, Figl, Wagner & Rolf, ) or regions growing segmentation thresholding (Park, Kim, Kim, Kim & Chang, ) by eliminating the need to delineate sinus graft from resident bone especially after graft consolidation has taken place.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen‐stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation—Complications, patient‐reported outcomes and volumetric analysis

Alayan

Ivanovski

2017

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

MSA using a lateral wall approach is safe and associated with mild to moderate pain and restrictions to daily activities for 48-72 hr. Patients' reports of morbidity were greater with autogenous bone harvesting. Collagen-stabilized ABBM provides comparable bone volume to AB + ABBM that is sufficient for placement of implants of adequate size with no need for further vertical augmentation. Engaging the surrounding sinus walls had a significant positive impact on graft volume.

show abstract

Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines

Abstract: Orthodontic treatment of impacted canines created a significant increase in maxillary sinus volume when the impacted canines were closer with respect to the maxillary sinus.

Cited by 27 publications

References 22 publications

Surgeons’ Performance Determining the Amount of Graft Material for Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Tomography

Surgeons’ Performance Determining the Amount of Graft Material for Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Tomography

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Changes in Growing Subjects: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen‐stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation—Complications, patient‐reported outcomes and volumetric analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About